首页> 外文期刊>Industrial Law Journal >Privatization of Wrongful Dismissal Protection in Comparative Perspective
【24h】

Privatization of Wrongful Dismissal Protection in Comparative Perspective

机译:比较视角下的不当解雇保护私有化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The US Supreme Court has allowed employers to sweep employee claims of violation of most labour protective law into arbitration systems that employers unilaterally establish. The law would not allow employers in the UK, France or Germany to do so. This essay explores how and why that is so in each of these countries. It explains the US exceptionalism by reference to public choice theory, ie, by resort to the economics of judicial shirking.
机译:美国最高法院已允许雇主将违反大多数劳动保护法的雇员索赔要求纳入雇主单方面建立的仲裁系统。法律不允许英国,法国或德国的雇主这样做。本文探讨了在每个国家中如何以及为什么这样做。它通过参考公共选择理论(即诉诸司法避让的经济学)来解释美国的例外主义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号