首页> 外文期刊>Reliability, IEEE Transactions on >Cost Based Risk Analysis to Identify Inspection and Restoration Intervals of Hidden Failures Subject to Aging
【24h】

Cost Based Risk Analysis to Identify Inspection and Restoration Intervals of Hidden Failures Subject to Aging

机译:基于成本的风险分析,以识别可能老化的隐藏故障的检查和恢复间隔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper develops a cost rate function (CRF) to identify the optimum interval and frequency of inspection and restoration of aircraft''s repairable components which are undergoing aging, and whose failures are hidden, i.e. are detectable by inspection or upon demand. The paper considers two prevalent strategies, namely Failure Finding Inspection (FFI), and a combination of FFI with restoration actions (FFI$+$ Res), for both the “non-safety effect,” and the “safety effect” categories of hidden failures. As-bad-as-old (ABAO) inspection effectiveness, and as-good-as-new (AGAN) restoration effectiveness are considered. In case of repair due to findings by inspection, as-bad-as-old repair effectiveness is considered. The proposed method considers inspection and repair times, and takes into account the costs associated with inspection, repair, and restoration; and the potential losses due to the inability to use the aircraft (maintenance downtime). It also considers the cost associated with accidents caused by the occurrence of multiple failure. The approach used in this study for risk constraint optimization is based on the mean fraction of time during which the unit is not functioning within inspection intervals (MFDT), and the average interval unavailability behavior within the restoration period. In the case of an operational limit, when it is not possible to remove the unit for restoration, or one needs to use the unit longer than the expected operating time, the paper introduces an approach to analyzing the possibility of and conditions for providing an extension to the restoration interval that satisfies the risk constraints and the business requirements at the same time.
机译:本文开发了一种成本率函数(CRF),以识别检查和恢复正在老化的飞机可维修组件的最佳间隔和频率,这些可维修组件的故障是隐藏的,即可以通过检查或根据需要进行检测。本文针对“非安全影响”和“安全影响”类别,考虑了两种流行的策略,即故障发现检查(FFI)和FFI与恢复措施的组合(FFI $ + $ Res)。失败。考虑了旧时(ABAO)检查的有效性和新旧时(AGAN)的恢复有效性。如果是通过检查发现的维修,则应考虑旧时的维修效果。所提出的方法考虑了检查和维修时间,并考虑了与检查,维修和恢复相关的成本;以及由于无法使用飞机而造成的潜在损失(维修停机时间)。它还考虑了与因发生多次故障而导致的事故相关的成本。在本研究中,用于风险约束优化的方法是基于在检查间隔(MFDT)内设备无法正常工作的平均时间分数以及恢复期内的平均间隔不可用行为。在操作限制的情况下,当无法拆卸该单元进行恢复,或者需要使用比预期的操作时间更长的时间时,本文介绍了一种方法来分析提供扩展的可能性和条件。到同时满足风险约束和业务需求的恢复间隔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号