首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering >Automating knowledge acquisition: a propositional approach to representing expertise as an alternative to repertory grid technique
【24h】

Automating knowledge acquisition: a propositional approach to representing expertise as an alternative to repertory grid technique

机译:自动化知识获取:一种代表专业知识的命题方法,作为储备格网技术的替代方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Repertory grid technique plays a central role in the elicitation methodology of many well-reported knowledge acquisition tools or workbenches. However, the dependability of these systems is low where the technique breaks down or proves inadequate due to limited expressive power and other problems. The paper introduces an alternate approach based on Personal Construct Theory that elicits an expert's knowledge as a network of terms that constitutes a propositional formalism. An extended example is used to both highlight the difficulties encountered using repertory grids and illustrate how these are overcome using the proposed approach. The results of an empirical study are presented where an experienced clinician compared the knowledge structures that she constructed for a diagnostic task using each elicitation technique. Furthermore, although the network representation is amenable to inductive learning methods for generating production rules, an inference method is demonstrated which reveals the formalism's categorical reasoning potential. The authors conclude that it is more appropriate to classify such methods as either mediating or immediate rather than the knowledge structures they employ. The paper contributes to a better understanding of constructivist formalisms developed for knowledge acquisition.
机译:储备格网技术在许多报告良好的知识获取工具或工作台的启发方法中起着核心作用。但是,由于有限的表达能力和其他问题,这些技术崩溃或证明不足,这些系统的可靠性很低。本文介绍了一种基于个人建构理论的替代方法,该方法将专家的知识作为构成命题形式主义的术语网络来激发。一个扩展的示例既可以突出显示使用存储网格所遇到的困难,又可以说明如何使用建议的方法克服这些困难。提出了一项实证研究的结果,其中经验丰富的临床医生使用每种启发技术比较了她为诊断任务构建的知识结构。此外,尽管网络表示适用于用于生成生产规则的归纳学习方法,但仍展示了一种推理方法,该方法揭示了形式主义的类别推理潜力。作者得出的结论是,将此类方法归类为中介或即时方法比使用其所采用的知识结构更为合适。本文有助于更好地理解为知识获取而发展的建构主义形式主义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号