首页> 外文期刊>Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on >Evaluation of Aerial Remote Sensing Techniques for Vegetation Management in Power-Line Corridors
【24h】

Evaluation of Aerial Remote Sensing Techniques for Vegetation Management in Power-Line Corridors

机译:电力线走廊植被管理的航空遥感技术评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents an evaluation of airborne sensors for use in vegetation management in power-line corridors. Three integral stages in the management process are addressed, including the detection of trees, relative positioning with respect to the nearest power line, and vegetation height estimation. Image data, including multispectral and high resolution, are analyzed along with LiDAR data captured from fixed-wing aircraft. Ground truth data are then used to establish the accuracy and reliability of each sensor, thus providing a quantitative comparison of sensor options. Tree detection was achieved through crown delineation using a pulse-coupled neural network and morphologic reconstruction applied to multispectral imagery. Through testing, it was shown to achieve a detection rate of 96%, while the accuracy in segmenting groups of trees and single trees correctly was shown to be 75%. Relative positioning using LiDAR achieved root-mean-square-error (rmse) values of 1.4 and 2.1 m for cross-track distance and along-track position, respectively, while direct georeferencing achieved rmse of 3.1 m in both instances. The estimation of pole and tree heights measured with LiDAR had rmse values of 0.4 and 0.9 m, respectively, while stereo matching achieved 1.5 and 2.9 m. Overall, a small number of poles were missed with detection rates of 98% and 95% for LiDAR and stereo matching.
机译:本文介绍了用于电力线走廊植被管理的机载传感器的评估。解决了管理过程中的三个不可分割的阶段,包括树木的检测,相对于最近电力线的相对位置以及植被高度估计。分析图像数据,包括多光谱和高分辨率,以及从固定翼飞机捕获的LiDAR数据。然后,使用地面真实数据确定每个传感器的准确性和可靠性,从而提供传感器选项的定量比较。树木检测是通过使用脉冲耦合神经网络通过树冠勾画和将形态重建应用于多光谱图像来实现的。通过测试表明,该算法可实现96%的检测率,而正确地分割树木和单棵树木的准确率则显示为75%。使用LiDAR的相对定位在跨轨道距离和沿轨道位置分别获得了1.4和2.1 m的均方根误差(rmse)值,而在两种情况下,直接地理配准均实现了3.1 m的均方根值。用LiDAR测得的极点和树的高度的均方根值分别为0.4和0.9 m,而立体声匹配分别为1.5和2.9 m。总体而言,少了几个极点,而LiDAR和立体声匹配的检出率分别为98%和95%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号