首页> 外文期刊>Human resource management journal >The collective bargaining of flexicurity: A case for sector-level analysis? The Italian chemical and metalworking sectors compared
【24h】

The collective bargaining of flexicurity: A case for sector-level analysis? The Italian chemical and metalworking sectors compared

机译:灵活性的集体谈判:部门层面分析的案例?意大利化学和金属加工行业比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Although employment relations in Europe have long been seen as a factor of rigidity, limiting managerial discretion and adaptability, in the last 30 years, they have witnessed a trend towards decentralisation of collective bargaining and negotiations increasingly centred on flexibility-security trade-offs between employers and employees. Research on the contribution of collective bargaining to the so-called flexicurity has mostly focused on national-level institutional arrangements. In this article, we contend that meso-level differences need to feature more prominently in the debate. Our comparison of two sectors in the same country (chemicals and metalworking in Italy) shows that decentralisation has divergent effects on flexicurity issues depending in particular on differences in market structures and on depth of bargaining. The interplay between these two factors affects what we refer to as procedural security, which we view as important in ensuring sustainable trade-offs between flexibility and security.
机译:尽管长期以来,欧洲的雇佣关系一直被视为僵化,限制管理自由裁量权和适应性的因素,但在过去的30年中,它们见证了集体谈判权力下放的趋势,而谈判越来越集中于雇主之间的灵活性与安全权衡和员工。关于集体谈判对所谓的灵活性的贡献的研究主要集中在国家一级的制度安排上。在本文中,我们认为,中层差异必须在辩论中更加突出。我们对同一国家两个部门(意大利的化工和金属加工)的比较表明,权力下放对弹性问题有不同的影响,具体取决于市场结构的差异和讨价还价的深度。这两个因素之间的相互作用影响了我们所说的程序安全性,我们认为这对确保灵活性和安全性之间的可持续取舍非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号