首页> 外文期刊>Human resource development review >Through a Different Lens: A Survey of Linear Epistemological Assumptions Underlying HRD Models
【24h】

Through a Different Lens: A Survey of Linear Epistemological Assumptions Underlying HRD Models

机译:通过不同的视角:HRD模型基础上的线性认识论假设的调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article attempts to define a linear epistemology in terms of what it is rather than how it functions by situating it in context. I contend that a linear epistemology is the dominant epistemology in the field of HRD and as such undergirds a majority of HRD models. Although a linear epistemology's usefulness is implicit in its widespread impact on models and on their use, a linear epistemology has several limitations, including a tendency to privilege particular Western cultural and masculine worldviews, short-term measures, and effects close to the organization. Furthermore, a linear epistemology fails to account for synergies, environment, time, human free will, individual prior knowledge, and unknown features of a system. Under conditions of rapid change, linear models may potentially contribute to increasing organizational myopia. Organizations which misinterpret environmental conditions may take unnecessary risks which serve to reduce organizational life span. Finally, linear models may contribute to an unnecessarily wide theory-practice gap and may serve to reduce the spread of HRD practices and HRD as a profession. Future areas of research and implications for practice will be discussed.
机译:本文试图根据线性认识论的本质,而不是通过如何在上下文中发挥作用来定义线性认识论。我认为线性认识论是HRD领域的主要认识论,因此构成了大多数HRD模型的基础。尽管线性认识论的有用性隐含在其对模型及其使用的广泛影响中,但线性认识论有几个局限性,包括倾向于优先考虑特定的西方文化和男性世界观,短期措施以及对组织的影响。此外,线性认识论无法说明协同作用,环境,时间,人类自由意志,个人先验知识和系统的未知特征。在快速变化的条件下,线性模型可能会助长组织近视。误解环境条件的组织可能会承担不必要的风险,从而缩短组织的寿命。最后,线性模型可能会导致不必要的广泛的理论-实践差距,并可能有助于减少HRD实践和HRD作为专业的传播。将讨论未来的研究领域和实践意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号