首页> 外文期刊>Human Nature >Kin Preference and Partner Choice Patrilineal Descent and Biological Kinship in Lamaleran Cooperative Relationships
【24h】

Kin Preference and Partner Choice Patrilineal Descent and Biological Kinship in Lamaleran Cooperative Relationships

机译:Lamaleran合作关系中的亲属偏好和伙伴选择父系血统和生物亲属关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper presents a comparison of social kinship (patrilineage) and biological kinship (genetic relatedness) in predicting cooperative relationships in two different economic contexts in the fishing and whaling village of Lamalera, Indonesia. A previous analysis (Alvard, Human Nature 14:129–163, 2003) of boat crew affiliation data collected in the village in 1999 found that social kinship (patrilineage) was a better predictor of crew affiliation than was genetic kinship. A replication of this analysis using similar data collected in 2006 finds the same pattern: lineage is a better predictor than genetic kinship of crew affiliation, and the two together explain little additional variance over that explained by lineage alone. However, an analogous test on food-sharing relationships finds the opposite pattern: biological kinship is a better predictor of food-sharing relationships than is social kinship. The difference between these two cooperative contexts is interpreted in terms of kin preferences that shape partner choice, and the relative autonomy with which individuals can seek to satisfy those preferences. Drawing on stable matching theory, it is suggested that unilineal descent may serve as a stable compromise among multiple individuals’ incongruent partner preferences, with patriliny favored over matriliny in the crew-formation context because it leads to higher mean degrees of relatedness among male cooperators. In the context of food-sharing, kin preferences can be pursued relatively autonomously, without the necessity of coordinating preferences with those of other households through the institution of lineage.
机译:本文介绍了在印度尼西亚Lamalera渔村和捕鲸村在两种不同经济背景下预测合作关系时社会亲属关系(父系)和生物亲属关系(遗传相关性)的比较。先前对1999年该村收集的船员隶属关系数据的分析(Alvard,人性14:129–163,2003年)发现,与血缘亲属关系相比,社会亲属关系(父系)是船员隶属关系的更好预测指标。使用2006年收集的类似数据对该分析进行重复,发现了相同的模式:与谱系成员的亲属关系相比,谱系是更好的预测因子,两者相比仅由谱系解释的差异就很小。但是,对食物共享关系的类似测试却发现了相反的模式:与社会血统相比,生物血缘关系可以更好地预测食物共享关系。这两个合作环境之间的差异是根据塑造伴侣选择的亲属偏好以及个人可以寻求满足这些偏好的相对自治来解释的。根据稳定匹配理论,建议单亲后裔可以在多个人的不相称的伴侣偏好之间保持稳定的妥协,在船员编组的背景下,父系优先于母系优先,因为这会导致男性合作者之间的平均相关度更高。在分享粮食的情况下,可以相对自主地寻求亲属的喜好,而不必通过世系来协调其他家庭的喜好。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Human Nature》 |2011年第2期|p.156-176|共21页
  • 作者

    David A. Nolin;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号