首页> 外文期刊>Human Development >Essentialism, Power, and the Representation of Social Categories: A Folk Sociology Perspective
【24h】

Essentialism, Power, and the Representation of Social Categories: A Folk Sociology Perspective

机译:本质主义,权力和社会类别的表征:一种民间社会学视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper synthesizes two perspectives on essentialism: cognitive and social. The cognitive essentialist perspective argues that our bias to appeal to the psychological belief that categories have innate essences enables us to make inferences about social categories such as race, caste, and gender. The social essentialist perspective argues that essentialist thinking serves the needs of those in power to justify existing social and economic hierarchies. Examining the relationship between essentialism and power, this paper expands the framework for folk sociology, incorporating cognitive and social essentialist accounts to examine folk theories of social differences between caste, race, gender, and class, with a particular emphasis on social marginality and cultural narratives. Further, this paper discusses the relevance of the folk sociology perspective to the study of children's emerging understanding of their social world.
机译:本文综合了两种关于本质主义的观点:认知和社会。认知本质主义者的观点认为,我们偏向于对类别具有先天本质的心理学信念的诉求,这使我们能够对诸如种族,种姓和性别之类的社会类别做出推断。社会本质主义者的观点认为,本质主义者的思想服务于当权者的需求,以证明现有的社会和经济等级制度是正确的。通过研究本质主义与权力之间的关系,本文扩展了民间社会学的框架,纳入了认知和社会本质主义者的论述,以检验种姓,种族,性别和阶级之间社会差异的民间理论,并特别强调社会边缘化和文化叙事。此外,本文讨论了民间社会学观点与儿童对儿童对社会世界的新兴理解研究的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号