首页> 外文期刊>Housing studies >Approaches to workforce housing in London and Chicago: from targeted sectors to income-based eligibility
【24h】

Approaches to workforce housing in London and Chicago: from targeted sectors to income-based eligibility

机译:伦敦和芝加哥的劳动力住房方式:从目标行业到基于收入的资格

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In many cities, people with jobs essential to daily urban life-bus drivers, teachers, police, nurses and the like-cannot afford housing in proximity to their work. Municipal efforts to counter such job-housing imbalances include targeting such workers specifically or moderate-income households, more broadly, for housing support. This article investigates and assesses housing policy for modest-income workers in two cities, Chicago and London. Based on review of documents and key informant interviews, each city's policy context, aims, means and outcomes are analyzed. Effective strategies include working with public, private and third-sector partners to find upstream cost-effective solutions, increasing shared equity/ownership products and developing mechanisms to ensure long-term affordability of workforce housing. While each city's policies reflect local conditions, they also are indicative of broad trends in intermediate housing policy: an increase in stakeholders involved in programme administration and delivery, a continued focus on homeownership, rising income thresholds for eligibility and a shift away from targeting employment sectors.
机译:在许多城市,从事日常城市生活必不可少的工作的人,如驾驶员,教师,警察,护士等,无法在工作附近负担住房。市政当局为解决这种工作安置失衡的努力,包括针对这类工人,特别是中等收入家庭,提供住房支持。本文研究和评估了芝加哥和伦敦两个城市中低收入工人的住房政策。根据文件审查和关键知情人访谈,分析每个城市的政策背景,目标,手段和成果。有效的战略包括与公共,私人和第三部门合作伙伴合作,以寻找上游具有成本效益的解决方案,增加共享的股权/所有权产品,并建立机制以确保劳动力住房的长期承受能力。尽管每个城市的政策都反映了当地情况,但它们也表明了中级住房政策的广泛趋势:参与计划管理和交付的利益相关者的增加,对房屋所有权的持续关注,符合资格的收入门槛的提高以及从针对就业部门的转变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号