...
【24h】

REMOVAL JURISDICTION

机译:删除管辖权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana ruled that the homeowner defaulting on a mortgage, and who was sued by the lender in a foreclosure action in Indiana state court, could not remove the action to federal district court under federal question jurisdiction on the basis of federal statutes allegedly violated by the lender, where those statutes were cited by the homeowner in his counterclaim, and not by the plaintiff in his complaint. Countryside Bank v. Central Market of Indiana, 2020 WL 5627453, No: 2:20 CV 256 (N.D. Ind. Sept. 21, 2020).
机译:印第安纳北部的美国地区法院规定了房主违约的抵押贷款,并在印第安纳州法院的止赎行动中起诉贷方起诉,无法在联邦问题司法管辖区下删除联邦地区法院的行动据称贷方涉嫌违反联邦法规的基础,在其反诉中的房主引用了这些法规,而不是原告在他的投诉中被诉讼。乡村银行v。印第安纳州中央市场,2020 WL 5627453,NO:2:20 CV 256(N.D.Ind。9月21日,2020年)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号