【24h】

REMOVAL JURISDICTION

机译:删除管辖权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma ruled in Laizure v. CSAA Insurance Exchange, 2020 WL 6136234, Case No. 19-CV-388-JED-JFJ (N.D. Okla. Oct. 19, 2020) that the defendant Oklahoma auto club, which sold homeowners insurance of the co-defendant insurance exchange, successfully removed a state court action brought by a policyholder to the federal district court based on diversity jurisdiction, where the defendants submitted evidence that the auto club merged with a national alliance of auto clubs which was a citizen of Delaware, prior to the filing of the suit. Lacy Leigh Laizure, an Oklahoma citizen, filed this action in Oklahoma state court, alleging that a July 2018 a house she owned in Tulsa County suffered severe damage as a result of a water heater leak. She alleged she was covered by a homeowners policy issued by CSAA Fire & Casualty Insurance Company ("CSAA"), but that CSAA failed to cover the repairs. The suit against CSAA, CSAA Insurance Exchange ("Exchange"), and Automobile Club of Oklahoma ("Auto Club") was for breach of contract and bad faith.
机译:美国地区法院为俄克拉荷马州北部区统治在莱苏·保险交易所,2020年WL 6136234,案件19-CV-388-JED-JFJ(ND OKLA。10月19日,2020年10月19日)那是被告俄克拉荷马州汽车俱乐部售出了共同被告保险交换的房主保险,成功地删除了保单持有人基于多样性管辖权的联邦地区法院提出的国家法院行动,被告提交了汽车俱乐部与汽车全国联盟合并的证据在提交诉讼之前,这是特拉华州公民的俱乐部。俄克拉荷马州公民莱兹莱兹莱兹(Lacy Leighure)在俄克拉荷马州立法院提起这一行动,指称2018年7月,她在塔尔萨县拥有的房子因热水器泄漏而受到严重的伤害。她所称她被Csaa Fire&Casishty保险公司(“CSAA”)发布的房主政策所涵盖,但CSAA未能覆盖维修。对抗CSAA,CSAA保险交易所(“交流”)和俄克拉荷马州(“汽车俱乐部”)的汽车俱乐部的诉讼是违反合同和恶意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号