首页> 外文期刊>History of Education: Journal of the History of Education Society >Structures and systems and bodies and things: historical research on primary schooling and its professional relevance
【24h】

Structures and systems and bodies and things: historical research on primary schooling and its professional relevance

机译:结构,系统,身体和事物:关于小学教育及其专业意义的历史研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recalling its origins as a research journal addressing educationists this article seeks to understand historical research published in History of Education as aimed at a professional audience. Primary schooling provides a significant focus as the study of education history was fostered especially in the training of elementary teachers. 1 1‘Primary’ here refers to the contemporary context, ‘elementary’ to the historical. These two contrasting terms are often found interchangeably in the literature, with regard to historical time and to geographical location, in some cases varying as descriptors of ‘education’ on the one hand or ‘schools’ on the other. Various usages in the course of this article reflect terms used by authors whose works are referred to, or their application at different times and in different countries. ‘Elementary’ was succeeded by ‘primary’ as a statutory definition in the UK in 1944, but remains the preferred term in the USA, Japan and France, ‘Grundschule’ or ‘grundskola’ in Germany and Sweden, with ‘primary’ prevailing in Spain, Portugal and Italy. View all notes In that context a traditional strand of research on structures and systems is recognised for its past achievements and continuing importance. At the same time this account identifies and welcomes continuing innovations in research focus and research method, but asks about potential audiences in the field and argues the importance of reaching a wider professional readership. Over the lifetime of the journal History of Education, political, cultural and institutional contexts have changed along with changing research methodologies. These parallel shifts suggest that the character of research in our field is not simply the product of autonomous intellectual currents but part of a larger pattern of change that embraces schooling. Recognition of this fact should remind educationists of the value of applying their historical research to elucidating current issues. A marked trend in the lifetime of History of Education has been its increasingly international scope, and examples of research on elementary and primary education from Paedagogica Historica are referred to for comparison. View full textDownload full textKeywordselementary education, primary education, historiography, methodology, audience.Related var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2011.640356
机译:回顾其作为研究教育者的研究期刊的来历,旨在寻求了解《教育史》上针对专业读者的历史研究。小学教育成为一个重要的重点,因为对教育历史的研究尤其是在对基础教师的培训中得到了加强。 1 1”主要”在这里是指当代语境,而“基本”是指历史语境。关于历史时间和地理位置,这两个相反的术语经常在文献中互换使用,在某些情况下,一方面是作为“教育”的描述,另一方面是“学校”的描述。本文中的各种用法反映了引用其作品的作者使用的术语,或它们在不同时间和不同国家/地区的应用。 1944年,“基本”一词在英国被“基本”一词取代为法定定义,但在美国,日本和法国仍然是“ Grundschule”或“ grundskola”的首选术语。 ™在德国和瑞典,“ primary”在西班牙,葡萄牙和意大利盛行。在此背景下,对结构和系统的传统研究因其过去的成就和持续的重要性而得到认可。同时,该报告确定并欢迎研究重点和研究方法的不断创新,但询问该领域的潜在受众,并指出扩大专业读者群体的重要性。在《教育史》杂志的整个生命周期中,政治,文化和制度背景随着研究方法的变化而发生了变化。这些平行的变化表明,我们领域的研究特征不仅是自主知识流的产物,而且是包括学校教育在内的更大变化模式的一部分。对这一事实的认识应该提醒教育家,将其历史研究用于阐明当前问题的价值。教育史一生的显着趋势是它的国际范围日益扩大,并引用了Paedagogica Historica的基础教育和小学教育研究实例进行比较。查看全文下载全文关键字基础教育,初等教育,史学,方法论,受众。 ,google,更多“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2011.640356

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号