首页> 外文期刊>Higher Education in Europe >Webometric Ranking of World Universities: Introduction, Methodology, and Future Developments
【24h】

Webometric Ranking of World Universities: Introduction, Methodology, and Future Developments

机译:世界大学的Webometric排名:简介,方法论和未来发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Today the worldwide web (web) is one of the main sources of information and the main showcase for everyone (institutions, business enterprises, individuals, etc.) who wants to be recognized on in the 'real world'. At the academic level, universities have a very important role as a means to communicate scientific and cultural achievements. Web publication by scholars is not only a tool for scholarly communication but it is also a means to reach larger audiences and in general a reflection of the performance of the institutions. There have been several efforts to develop web indicators that can ultimately lead to build a university's rankings. This paper presents the Webometric Ranking of World Universities which is built using a combined indicator called WR that takes into account the number of published web pages (S) (twenty-five percent), the number of rich files, those in pdf, ps, doc and ppt format (R) (12.5 percent), the number of articles gathered from the Google Scholar Database (Sc) (12.5 percent,) and the total number of external inlinks (V) (fifty percent). The results show that there is a larger than expected academic digital divide between higher education institutions in the United States and those in the European Union. This kind of rankings using web indicators should be used to measure universities' performance in conjunction with more traditional academic indicators.
机译:如今,万维网是信息的主要来源之一,也是希望在“真实世界”中获得认可的每个人(机构,企业,个人等)的主要展示。在学术层面,大学作为交流科学和文化成就的一种手段,具有非常重要的作用。学者进行的网络出版不仅是学术交流的工具,而且还是一种吸引更多受众的手段,并且总体上反映了机构的绩效。已经做出了一些努力来开发网络指标,这些指标最终可以提高大学的排名。本文介绍了世界大学的Webometric排名,该排名是使用称为WR的组合指标建立的,该指标考虑了已发布网页的数量(S)(百分之二十五),丰富的文件数量,pdf,ps, doc和ppt格式(R)(12.5%),从Google学术搜索数据库(Sc)收集的文章数(12.5%)和外部链接的总数(V)(50%)。结果表明,美国的高等教育机构与欧盟的高等教育机构之间的学术数字鸿沟比预期的要大。这种使用网络指标的排名应与更传统的学术指标一起用于衡量大学的表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号