首页> 外文期刊>Health Promotion International >Evaluation findings on community participation in the California Healthy Cities and Communities program
【24h】

Evaluation findings on community participation in the California Healthy Cities and Communities program

机译:关于社区参与加利福尼亚健康城市与社区计划的评估结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As part of an evaluation of the California Healthy Cities and Communities (CHCC) program, we evaluated resident involvement, broad representation and civic engagement beyond the local CHCC initiative. The evaluation design was a case study of 20 participating communities with cross-case analysis. Data collection methods included: coalition member surveys at two points in time, semi-structured interviews with key informants, focus groups with coalition members and document review. Participating communities were diverse in terms of population density, geography and socio-demographic characteristics. Over a 3-year period, grantees developed a broad-based coalition of residents and community sectors, produced a shared vision, conducted an asset-based community assessment, identified a priority community improvement focus, developed an action plan, implemented the plan and evaluated their efforts. Local residents were engaged through coalition membership, assessment activities and implementation activities. Ten of the 20 coalitions had memberships comprised of mainly local residents in the planning phase, with 5 maintaining a high level of resident involvement in governance during the implementation phase. Ninety percent of the coalitions had six or more community sectors represented (e.g. education, faith). The majority of coalitions described at least one example of increased input into local government decision-making and at least one instance in which a resident became more actively involved in the life of their community. Findings suggest that the Healthy Cities and Communities model can be successful in facilitating community participation.
机译:作为对加利福尼亚健康城市和社区(CHCC)计划的评估的一部分,我们评估了当地CHCC计划以外的居民参与,广泛代表和公民参与。评估设计是对20个参与社区进行案例分析的案例研究。数据收集方法包括:在两个时间点对联盟成员进行调查,与关键线人进行半结构化访谈,与联盟成员进行焦点小组讨论和文档审查。参与社区的人口密度,地理和社会人口特征各不相同。在三年的时间里,受赠者建立了居民和社区部门的广泛联盟,形成了共同的愿景,进行了资产为基础的社区评估,确定了重点社区改善重点,制定了行动计划,实施了计划并进行了评估他们的努力。通过联盟成员资格,评估活动和实施活动来吸引当地居民。在计划阶段,20个联盟中有10个成员主要由当地居民组成,在实施阶段,有5个联盟保持着较高的居民参与治理水平。 90%的联盟有六个或更多的社区部门代表(例如教育,信仰)。大多数联盟至少描述了增加对地方政府决策投入的一个例子,以及至少一个居民更加积极地参与其社区生活的例子。研究结果表明,“健康城市和社区”模型可以成功地促进社区参与。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Health Promotion International》 |2009年第4期|p.300-310|共11页
  • 作者单位

    1Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA, 2Center for Civic Partnerships, Public Health Institute, Sacramento, CA 95815, USA, 3Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27401, USA and 4Department of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Oklahoma College of Public Health, Oklahoma City, OK 73109, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号