首页> 外文期刊>Group decision and negotiation >Manipulation in Conditional Decision Markets
【24h】

Manipulation in Conditional Decision Markets

机译:有条件决策市场中的操纵

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Conditional decision markets concurrently predict the future and decide on it. These markets price the impact of decisions, conditional on them being executed. After the markets close, a principal decides which decisions are executed based on the prices in the markets. As some decisions are not executed, the respective outcome cannot be observed, and the markets predicting the impact of non-executed decisions are void. This allows ex-post costless manipulation of such markets. We conduct two versions of an online experiment to explore scenarios in which a principal runs conditional decision markets to inform her choice among a set of a risky alternatives. We find that the level of manipulation depends on the simplicity of the market setting. When a trader is alone, has the power to move prices far enough, and the decision is deterministically tied to market prices or a very high correlation between prices and decision is implied, only then manipulation occurs. As soon as another trader is present to add risk to manipulation, manipulation is eliminated. Our results contrast theoretical work on conditional decision markets in two ways: First, our results suggest that manipulation may not be as meaningful an issue. Second, probabilistic decision rules are used to add risk to manipulation; when manipulation is not a meaningful issue, deterministic decisions provide the better decision with less noise. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental analysis isolating the effects of the conditional nature of decision markets.
机译:有条件的决策市场同时预测未来并做出决定。这些市场为决策的影响定价,但前提是要执行决策。市场收盘后,委托人根据市场价格决定执行哪些决策。由于某些决策未执行,因此无法观察到相应的结果,并且预测未执行决策影响的市场也将无效。这样可以事后无价地操纵此类市场。我们进行了两个版本的在线实验,以探讨委托人经营有条件决策市场的情况,以告知她在一组风险较大的选择中进行选择。我们发现操纵水平取决于市场环境的简单性。当交易者独自一人时,具有将价格移动到足够远的权力,并且确定性地将决策与市场价格联系在一起,或者暗示价格与决策之间具有很高的相关性,然后才进行操纵。一旦出现另一个交易员给操纵增加风险,就消除了操纵。我们的结果在两个方面与条件决策市场上的理论工作进行了对比:首先,我们的结果表明操纵可能没有那么有意义。其次,使用概率决策规则来增加操纵风险。当操纵不是有意义的问题时,确定性决策可提供更好的决策,同时减少噪音。据我们所知,这是第一个实验分析,它隔离了决策市场的条件性质的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号