首页> 外文期刊>Globalizations >The G20's engagement with civil society: participation without contestation?
【24h】

The G20's engagement with civil society: participation without contestation?

机译:G20与民间社会的参与:参加没有争议吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With global governance experiencing a democratic deficit, the G20's formalized engagement with civil society - the C20 - seems to be an anomaly. However, there is a gap between the G20's rhetoric and practice, with the C20 incorporating civil society organizations (CSOs) into the G20, while also limiting their ability to contribute to its agenda. This article attempts make sense of this gap by analysing the C20 through the modes of participation framework, arguing it represents an attempt to organize and manage social conflicts emerging from civil society, but do so in a way that constrains its ability to contest G20 policy. The article analyses the ways in which the C20 is designed to do so, as well as CSO strategies to overcome these constraints. While these strategies increase CSO's leverage and independence, their effectiveness remains shaped by G20 practices and the underlying political economy structures of the global economy.
机译:随着全球治理体验民主赤字,G20与民间社会的正式参与 - C20似乎是一个异常。然而,在G20的修辞和实践之间存在差距,C20将民间社会组织(CSO)纳入G20,同时也限制了他们致力于其议程的能力。本文通过参与框架的模式分析C20来讨论该差距来说,争论这代表了组织和管理民间社会中出现的社会冲突的试图,争论并以一种限制竞争其竞争的竞争能力的方式来组织和管理社会冲突。文章分析了C20旨在这样做的方式,以及克服这些限制的CSO策略。虽然这些策略增加了CSO的杠杆和独立,但其效力仍然是全球经济的潜在政治经济结构的塑造。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号