首页> 外文期刊>Global Networks >Transnational political action and 'global civil society' in practice: the case of Oxfam
【24h】

Transnational political action and 'global civil society' in practice: the case of Oxfam

机译:跨国政治行动与实践中的“全球公民社会”:乐施会的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The term 'global civil society' has taken on increasing significance within scholarly debate over the past decade. In this article we seek to understand transnational political agency via the study of a particular transnational actor, Oxfam. We argue that various schools of thought surrounding the global civil society concept, in particular the prevailing liberal-cosmopolitan approach, are unable to conceptualize transnational political action in practice - due largely, in the case of liberal-cosmopolitanism, to a shared normative agenda. We also assess what contribution literature on development and civil society has made to the analysis of groups such as Oxfam. In investigating Oxfam's own perceptions of its context and the meanings of its agency, we discover an anti-political perspective derived from an encounter between Oxfam's longstanding commitment to liberal internationalism and globalization discourse. Existing scholarship has insufficiently identified the local or parochial nature of the identities of global civil society actors.
机译:在过去的十年中,“全球公民社会”一词在学术辩论中的意义日益重大。在本文中,我们试图通过研究特定的跨国演员乐施会来了解跨国政治机构。我们认为,围绕全球公民社会概念的各种流派,尤其是流行的自由主义-世界主义方法,在实践中无法将跨国政治行动概念化-在很大程度上,由于自由主义-世界主义,是基于共同的规范性议程。我们还评估了有关发展和公民社会的文献对乐施会等群体的分析做出了哪些贡献。在调查乐施会自己对它的背景及其代理机构的含义的看法时,我们发现了一种反政治观点,它源于乐施会对自由国际主义的长期承诺与全球化话语之间的相遇。现有的奖学金不足以识别全球公民社会参与者身份的地​​方性或狭nature性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号