首页> 外文期刊>Geografiska annaler >Fatherland, faith, and family values: anti-liberalism and the desire for difference among Russian grassroots conservatives
【24h】

Fatherland, faith, and family values: anti-liberalism and the desire for difference among Russian grassroots conservatives

机译:祖国,信仰和家庭价值观:反自由主义和俄罗斯基层保守党之间对差异的愿望

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This is a revised and extended version of my contribution to the Vega Symposium on Resurgent Nationalisms and Populist Politics in the Neoliberal Age, held at the Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, in April 2018. It is part of a Special Issue of Geografiska Annaler, Series B which also includes articles by Gillian Hart, Kanishka Goonewardena, and Manu Goswami. The article investigates how understandings of the concept 'liberalism' have shifted among ultranationalist Russian grassroots as the 'roll-back' neoliberalism (in Peck and Tickell's terms) of the turbulent 1990s has developed into 'roll-out' governance during Putin's presidency. A moral conservative Russian grassroots mobilization is traced from its origins as a crusade against sexual education in the late 1990s, to a campaign against reforms of the state child protection system initiated in the mid-2000s. In this time span, understandings of 'liberalism' as chaos and elimination of boundaries have been superseded by an image of liberalism as totalitarianism, a conception resembling academic criticism of neoliberal governmentality despite the movement's rejection of the purportedly 'liberal' Academy. The principal rejection of 'liberalism' is in practice mitigated also by ideals of communitarianism and civic engagement bearing many similarities to Western notions of 'civic liberalism'.
机译:这是在斯德哥尔摩斯德哥尔摩斯德哥尔摩斯德哥尔摩斯德哥尔摩举行的新自由主义举行的新自由主义中对斯维加和民族主义政治的贡献的修订和扩展版本。它是Geografiska Annaler特别问题的一部分, B系列还包括Gillian Hart,Kanishka GoOneulayena和Manu Goswami的文章。本文调查了概念“自由主义”的理解如何在超法主义者俄罗斯基层中转移,因为“回滚”的新自由主义(在Peck和Tickell的术语)的动荡的1990年代在普京总统期间发展成“推出”治理。俄罗斯保守派基层动员的起源是在20世纪90年代末作为一个反对性教育的十字军划线的追查,以反对2000年代中期的国家儿童保护制度改革的竞选活动。在这段时间跨度,对混乱和消除界限的对“自由主义”的理解已经被自由主义作为极权主义的形象取代了一个类似于新自由主义政府的学术批判的观念,尽管据称“自由主义”学院拒绝了新自由主义的政府性。对“自由主义”的主要拒绝在实践中,通过社群主义和公民参与的理想也有许多与“公民自由主义”的西方概念相似的理想。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号