...
首页> 外文期刊>Food research international >Cognitive decision strategies adopted by consumers in reminder difference tests: Influence of the authenticity test
【24h】

Cognitive decision strategies adopted by consumers in reminder difference tests: Influence of the authenticity test

机译:消费者在提示差异测试中采用的认知决策策略:真实性测试的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Discrimination tests are used in food companies to quantify small differences between products. Within the diversity of methods available, some are quicker to conduct, whereas others are more sensitive or statistically powerful. One class of methods includes the reminder tasks in which the reference product is given before tasting the actual test stimuli. During the task, such a 'reminder' can be compared directly to each test stimulus, or alternatively, only serve to prime the memory of the judge without being taken into account in decision-making. Previous research with trained judges provided evidence for the latter process while research with untrained consumers has provided some evidence for the former process. Two studies were conducted with untrained consumers using the A Not-AR and 2-AFCR reminder tasks. Objectives were to determine the decision strategies used in, and the relative sensitivity of the tasks. In addition, the use of an "authenticity test" was explored to see if this has a positive effect on test performance. In the first study, mayonnaise and ice tea with small stimulus differences (d' < 1) were used in A Not-AR and 2-AFCR. Results were compared to those from A Not-A and 2 AFC tasks, with and without an authenticity test. It was difficult to draw clear conclusions on the decision strategy used, though the use of an authenticity test increased the sensitivity for these small differences, as it improved the performance of 6 out of 8 tests. In the second study, ice teas with larger stimulus differences (at two levels) were tested using the A Not -AR and 2-AFCR tasks, in comparison to the same-different task. The results showed that consumers use the less optimal strategies and that the authenticity test decreases performance, which is contradictory to the results of the first study. It seems that for very small stimulus differences the authenticity test can improve performance, but with larger differences the authenticity test decreases performance; it seems to confuse the judges.
机译:食品公司使用区分测试来量化产品之间的细微差异。在可用方法的多样性中,有些方法执行起来较快,而另一些方法则更为敏感或具有统计意义。一类方法包括提醒任务,其中在品尝实际的测试刺激之前先给出参考产品。在任务过程中,可以将这种“提醒”直接与每个测试刺激进行比较,或者仅在不考虑决策的情况下仅用于充实法官的记忆。先前由训练有素的法官进行的研究为后一个过程提供了证据,而对未经训练的消费者的研究为前一个过程提供了一些证据。使用A Not-AR和2-AFCR提醒任务对未经培训的消费者进行了两项研究。目的是确定所使用的决策策略以及任务的相对敏感性。此外,还探索了使用“真实性测试”来查看这是否对测试性能产生积极影响。在第一个研究中,在Not Not-AR和2-AFCR中使用了蛋黄酱和刺激性差异较小(d'<1)的冰茶。将结果与通过和不通过真实性测试的A Not-A和2 AFC任务的结果进行比较。尽管使用了真实性测试提高了对这些微小差异的敏感性,但由于它提高了8个测试中的6个的性能,因此很难对所使用的决策策略得出清晰的结论。在第二项研究中,与相同任务相比,使用A Not -AR和2-AFCR任务测试了刺激差异较大(两个级别)的冰茶。结果表明,消费者使用的是次优策略,而真实性测试会降低性能,这与第一个研究的结果相矛盾。看起来,对于很小的刺激差异,真实性测试可以改善性能,但是对于较大的差异,真实性测试会降低性能;这似乎使法官们感到困惑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号