首页> 外文期刊>Expert Systems with Application >Decision support model for prioritizing railway level crossings for safety improvements: Application of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy system
【24h】

Decision support model for prioritizing railway level crossings for safety improvements: Application of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy system

机译:优先考虑铁路平交道口以提高安全性的决策支持模型:自适应神经模糊系统的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Every year, more than 400 people are killed in over 1.200 accidents at road-rail level crossings in the European Union (European Railway Agency, 2011). Together with tunnels and specific road black spots, level crossings have been identified as being a particular weak point in road infrastructure, seriously jeopardizing road safety. In the case of railway transport, level crossings can represent as much as 29% of all fatalities caused by railway operations. In Serbia there are approximately 2.350 public railway level crossings (RLC) across the country, protected either passively (64%) or by active systems (25%). Passive crossings provide only a stationary sign warning of the possibility of trains crossing. Active systems, by contrast, activate automatic warning devices (i.e., flashing lights, bells, barriers, etc.) as a train approaches. Securing a level crossing (whether it has an active or passive system of protection) is a material expenditure, and having in mind that Serbian Railways is a public company directly financed from the budget of the Republic of Serbia, it cannot be expected that all unsecured level crossings be part of a programme of securing them. The most common choice of which level crossings to secure is based on media and society pressure, and on the possible consequences of a rise in the number of traffic accidents at the level crossings. The process of selecting a level crossing where safety equipment will be installed is accompanied by a greater or lesser degree of uncertainty of the essential criteria for making a relevant decision. In order to exploit these uncertainties and ambiguities, fuzzy logic is used in this paper. Here also, modeling of the Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is presented, which supports the process of selecting which level crossings should receive an investment of safety equipment. The ANFIS model is a trained set of data which is obtained using a method of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making and fuzzy clustering techniques. 20 experts in road and rail traffic safety at railway level crossings took part in the study. The ANFIS model was trained with the experiential knowledge of these experts and tested on a selection of rail crossings in the Belgrade area regarding an investment of safety equipment. The ANFIS model was tested on 88 level crossings and a comparison was made between the data set it produced and the data set obtained on the basis of predictions made by experts.
机译:每年,在欧盟的公路—铁路平交道口发生的1200余起交通事故中,有400多人丧生(欧洲铁路局,2011年)。平交道口与隧道和特定的道路黑点一起被认为是道路基础设施中的一个特别薄弱点,严重危害了道路安全。就铁路运输而言,平交道口可占铁路运营造成的所有死亡的29%。在塞尔维亚,全国大约有2.350个公共铁路平交道口(RLC),受到被动保护(64%)或受主动系统保护(25%)。被动过境仅提供静止标志,警告火车可能通过。相比之下,主动系统会在火车驶近时激活自动警告设备(即,闪光灯,铃铛,障碍物等)。确保平交道口(无论它具有主动还是被动的保护系统)是一项重大支出,并且要记住塞尔维亚铁路是一家直接由塞尔维亚共和国预算直接资助的上市公司,所以不能指望所有无抵押的平交道口是确保其安全的计划的一部分。设置哪个平交道口最常见的选择是基于媒体和社会的压力,以及平交道口交通事故数量增加可能带来的后果。选择将要安装安全设备的平交道口的过程会或多或少地对做出相关决定的基本标准产生不确定性。为了利用这些不确定性和模糊性,本文使用模糊逻辑。在这里,还提出了自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)的建模,该模型支持选择哪个平交道口应该获得安全设备投资的过程。 ANFIS模型是一组经过训练的数据,可以使用模糊多准则决策和模糊聚类技术获得。铁路平交道口的20名道路和铁路交通安全专家参加了研究。 ANFIS模型是在这些专家的经验知识的基础上进行训练的,并在贝尔格莱德地区有关安全设备投资的精选铁路道口上进行了测试。 ANFIS模型在88个平交道口上进行了测试,并根据专家的预测对所产生的数据集和获得的数据集进行了比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号