首页> 外文期刊>Expert Systems with Application >A framework for water loss management in developing countries under fuzzy environment: Integration of Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS
【24h】

A framework for water loss management in developing countries under fuzzy environment: Integration of Fuzzy AHP with Fuzzy TOPSIS

机译:模糊环境下发展中国家失水管理的框架:模糊层次分析法与模糊TOPSIS法的整合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Facing water scarcity conditions water utilities cannot longer tolerate inefficiencies in their water systems. To guarantee sustainable water management one central task is reducing water losses from the supply systems. There are numerous challenges in managing water losses, manifested in a variety of options, their complexities, multiple evaluation criteria, inherent uncertainties and the conflicting objectives and interests of different stakeholders. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approaches for decision support in this complex topic. The study covers identifying the key options among a set of options that have been proposed within a framework of strategies to reduce water losses in water distribution systems of developing countries. The proposed methodology was initiated by developing a hierarchical structure of the decision problem that consists of four levels: Overall objective, main criteria, evaluation criteria and options. Different stakeholders were engaged in the process of structuring and evaluating the decision problem. An integrated methodology that combines fuzzy set theory with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods was then employed. This methodology has the potential to transform qualitative data into equivalent quantitative measures. Fuzzy AHP was used to create weights for main and evaluation criteria, while Fuzzy TOPSIS was used to aid the ranking of options in terms of their potential to meet the overall objective based on the evaluations and preferences of decision makers. The results showed that pressure management and control strategy was the most prevalent one, followed by employing advanced techniques and establishment of district metered areas. Their dominance was highly connected to the local and boundary conditions of the case study. The sensitivity analysis results showed that strongest and weakest options were less sensitive to changes in weights of evaluation criteria, which could be attributed to the strong consensus in strengthening the best option and neglecting the worst option. This study emphasized the successful application of MCDA in dealing with complicated issues in the context of water loss management It is anticipated that, the integration of this developed framework in the planning policies of water utilities in developing countries can help in conducting better control over water losses. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:面对缺水的状况,自来水公司不能再忍受其供水系统的效率低下。为了保证可持续的水管理,一项中心任务是减少供水系统的水损失。在管理水损方面存在许多挑战,表现为多种选择,其复杂性,多种评估标准,固有的不确定性以及不同利益相关者的目标和利益冲突。这项研究证明了多标准决策分析(MCDA)方法在此复杂主题中为决策支持的有效性。该研究涵盖了在减少发展中国家供水系统中水损失的战略框架内提出的一系列备选方案中确定关键方案。拟议的方法是通过制定决策问题的层次结构来启动的,该层次结构由四个级别组成:总体目标,主要标准,评估标准和选项。不同的利益相关者参与了结构化和评估决策问题的过程。然后,采用了将模糊集理论与层次分析法(AHP)和“与理想解决方案相似的优先顺序技术”(TOPSIS)相结合的集成方法。这种方法有可能将定性数据转换为等效的定量度量。使用模糊层次分析法为主要标准和评估标准创建权重,而使用模糊TOPSIS方法根据决策者的评估和偏好,根据实现整体目标的潜力来帮助对选项进行排名。结果表明,压力管理和控制策略是最普遍的一种,其次是采用先进技术并建立区域计量区域。他们的主导地位与案例研究的局部和边界条件高度相关。敏感性分析结果表明,最强和最弱的方案对评估标准权重的变化不太敏感,这可能归因于在加强最佳方案和忽略最坏方案方面的强烈共识。这项研究强调了MCDA在水损失管理背景下成功解决复杂问题的成功应用。可以预期的是,将这一已发展的框架纳入发展中国家水务公司的规划政策中将有助于更好地控制水损失。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号