...
首页> 外文期刊>Evaluation review >Level-I Trauma Center Effects on Return-to-Work Outcomes
【24h】

Level-I Trauma Center Effects on Return-to-Work Outcomes

机译:一级创伤中心对重返工作成果的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Injury is the leading cause of death for persons aged I -44 years in the United States. Injuries have a substantial economic cost. For that reason, regional systems of trauma care in which the more acutely injured patients are transported to Level-I (L-l) trauma centers (TCs) has been widely advocated. However, the cost of TC care is high, raising questions about the value of such an approach. Objectives: To study L-l TC effectiveness and study return-to-work (RTW) outcomes. Research Design: Using data from National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma, the authors address the issue of selection bias by comparing naive estimates to matching techniques, as well as to nonlinear instrumental variable models (2SRI) and bivariate probit estimators. Subjects: Individuals ages 18-64 who were mainly working before traumatic injury. Patients selected for the study were treated at 69 hospitals located in 12 states in the United States. N = 1790. Measures: Treatment is binary indicator on whether treated at L-l TC. Outcome is binary indicator on whether returned to work within 3 months after injury. Covariates include: demographics, pre-injury characteristics (job, health and insurance status), injury descriptors, other income sources, etc. Results: Across all models that control for unobserved factors, the authors find that L-l TC treatment is positively associated with RTW within 3 months after injury. The estimated average marginal effect of treatment on the probability of RTW ranges from 23 to 38 percentage points. Conclusions: Benefits of L-l TC care extend beyond mortality and morbidity.
机译:背景:在美国,伤害是I -44岁年龄段人的主要死亡原因。伤害会带来巨大的经济损失。由于这个原因,已经广泛地倡导了将创伤更严重的患者转移到I级(L-1)创伤中心(TC)的创伤护理区域系统。但是,TC护理的成本很高,这对这种方法的价值提出了疑问。目的:研究L-1 TC的有效性并研究重返工作(RTW)的结果。研究设计:作者使用《国家创伤费用与结果研究》的数据,通过将天真估计与匹配技术以及非线性工具变量模型(2SRI)和双变量概率估计值进行比较,解决了选择偏见的问题。对象:年龄在18-64岁之间的人,主要在遭受外伤之前工作。选择进行研究的患者在美国12个州的69家医院接受治疗。 N = 1790。措施:治疗是关于是否在L-1TC治疗的二元指标。结果是在受伤后3个月内是否恢复工作的二进制指标。协变量包括:人口统计学,伤害前特征(工作,健康和保险状况),伤害描述符,其他收入来源等。结果:在所有控制未观察因素的模型中,作者发现Ll TC治疗与RTW正相关受伤后3个月内。估计的治疗对RTW概率的平均边际效应为23至38个百分点。结论:L-1 TC护理的益处不仅限于死亡率和发病率。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Evaluation review》 |2012年第2期|p.133-164|共32页
  • 作者单位

    Senior Research Associate in Health Economics, Research Center for Social Protection and Health Economics (PROESA), Department of Economics, University Icesi,Calle 18 No. 122-135, Cali, Colombia;

    Department of Public Policy, University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC), Baltimore,MD, USA;

    Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    level-I trauma center; return to work; instrumental variables; 2sri; bivariate probit;

    机译:一级创伤中心;重返工作岗位;工具变量;2sri;双变量概率;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号