首页> 外文期刊>Ethics & the environment >MORAL RESPONSIVENESS AND NONHUMAN ANIMALS
【24h】

MORAL RESPONSIVENESS AND NONHUMAN ANIMALS

机译:道德责任与非人类动物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The thesis of this paper is that certain nonhuman animals could be conceived of as capable of moral motivation and subsequent moral behavior, with the appropriate behavioral, psychological and cognitive evidence. I argue that a certain notion of morality-morality as the process of conscious, reasoned deliberation over explicit moral concepts-is excessively exclusionary, and that such a notion describes one mode of moral cognition, but not, as others have argued, morality's essence. Instead, morality and moral behaviors could be viewed as natural phenomena that arose as a means by which social species could better cohere and survive, and one that consists of a spectrum of behaviors. Ultimately, I argue that the aforementioned notion of moral cognition has unfairly worked to exclude (certain) nonhuman animals from the sphere of morality as beings capable of moral behavior, and that instead we should be looking at moral behavior as a function of what I call 'moral responsiveness.'
机译:本文的论点是,可以将某些非人类动物构想为具有道德动机和随后的道德行为能力,并具有适当的行为,心理和认知证据。我认为,某种道德观念-道德是对显式道德概念的有意识的,理性的思考过程-过于排斥,并且这种观念描述了一种道德认知模式,但并未像其他人所主张的那样,描述了道德的本质。相反,道德和道德行为可以被视为自然现象,它是一种社会物种可以更好地凝聚和生存的手段,并且是由一系列行为组成的。最终,我认为前面提到的道德认知概念在将(某些)非人类动物排除在道德领域之外是不公平的,因为他们有道德行为的能力,相反,我们应该将道德行为视为我所说的功能“道德响应能力”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics & the environment》 |2019年第1期|45-76|共32页
  • 作者

    SERRIN RUTLEDGE-PRIOR;

  • 作者单位

    School of Politics and International Relations at the Australian National University in Canberra;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:14:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号