首页> 外文期刊>Environmental toxicology and chemistry >Use of prospective and retrospective risk assessment methods that simplify chemical mixtures associated with treated domestic wastewater discharges
【24h】

Use of prospective and retrospective risk assessment methods that simplify chemical mixtures associated with treated domestic wastewater discharges

机译:使用前瞻性和回顾性风险评估方法,简化与处理后的生活污水排放相关的化学混合物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A framework is presented that is intended to facilitate the evaluation of potential aquatic ecological risks resulting from discharges of down-the-drain chemicals. A scenario is presented using representatives of many of the types of chemicals that are treated domestically. Predicted environmental chemical concentrations are based on reported loading rates and routine removal rates for 3 types of treatment: trickling filter, activated sludge secondary treatment, and activated sludge plus advanced oxidation process as well as instream effluent dilution. In tier I, predicted effluent concentrations were compared with the lowest predicted-no-effect concentration (PNEC) obtained from the literature using safety factors as needed. A cumulative risk characterization ratio (cumRCR) <1.0 indicates that risk is unlikely and no further action is needed. Otherwise, a tier 2 assessment is used, in which PNECs are based on trophic level. If tier 2 indicates a possible risk, then a retrospective assessment is recommended. In tier 1, the cumRCR was >1.0 for all 3 treatment types in our scenario, even though no chemical exceeded a hazard quotient of 1.0 in activated sludge or advanced oxidation process. In tier 2, activated sludge yielded a lower cumRCR than trickling filter because of higher removal rates, and the cumRCR in the advanced oxidation process was 1.0. Based on the maximum cumulative risk ratio (MCR), more than one-third of the predicted risk was accounted for by one chemical, and at least 90% was accounted for by 3 chemicals, indicating that few chemicals influenced the mixture risk in our scenario. We show how a retrospective assessment can test whether certain chemicals hypothesized as potential drivers in the prospective assessment could have, or are having, deleterious effects on aquatic life. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:690-702. (c) 2017 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.
机译:提出了一个旨在促进对排泄性化学物质排放造成的潜在水生生态风险进行评估的框架。使用许多国内处理过的化学物质的代表提出了一个方案。预测的环境化学浓度基于所报告的三种处理类型的负载率和常规去除率:滴滤池,活性污泥二级处理,活性污泥加高级氧化工艺以及进水废水稀释。在第I层中,根据需要使用安全系数,将预测的废水浓度与从文献中获得的最低预测无效果浓度(PNEC)进行了比较。累积风险特征比率(cumRCR)<1.0表示风险不太可能,无需采取进一步措施。否则,将使用第2层评估,其中PNEC基于营养级别。如果第2层表示可能存在风险,则建议进行回顾性评估。在第1层中,在我们的方案中,对于所有3种处理类型,即使在活性污泥或高级氧化过程中,化学物质的危害系数均不超过1.0,cumRCR仍大于1.0。在第2层中,由于较高的去除率,活性污泥产生的cumRCR比滴滤过滤器低,并且高级氧化过程中的cumRCR为 1.0。根据最大累积风险比(MCR),一种化学品占了三分之一以上的预测风险,而三种化学品占了至少90%的预测风险,这表明在我们的方案中,很少有化学品会影响混合物的风险。我们展示了回顾性评估如何可以测试在预期评估中被假设为潜在驱动因素的某些化学物质是否会对水生生物造成有害影响或正在产生有害影响。 Environ Toxicol Chem 2018; 37:690-702。 (c)2017作者。 Wiley Periodicals,Inc.代表SETAC发布的《环境毒理学和化学》。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号