首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >College Students and Nature: Differing Thoughts of Fear, Danger, Disconnection, and Loathing
【24h】

College Students and Nature: Differing Thoughts of Fear, Danger, Disconnection, and Loathing

机译:大学生与自然:恐惧,危险,脱节和厌恶的不同思想

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite the existence of a robust body of research that investigates human-nature connections, few scholars have examined what people tend to ponder when they think of nature. The objective of the study is to find out how college and university students think about nature. The study also seeks to identify which factors are most significant in influencing students' thoughts about nature. This paper analyzes racial, gender, class, and academic differences in the way college students think about nature. The study of 287 American students found that respondents thought about a wide range of concepts and ideas when they contemplate nature. This article focuses on the demographic differences in thoughts about fear, danger, and loathing. This set of ideas has been the subject of scholarly research, and the findings presented herein contribute to this body of scholarship. The paper discusses both descriptive and multivariate techniques that are used to explore the topic. The study found that white students are less likely than racial/ethnic minorities to think about disconnection, predators, getting lost, loathsome or hateful places, fear, and danger when they think of nature. However, the results also show that it would be inaccurate to describe racial/ethnic minorities as universally fearful of and disconnected from nature. Moreover, the paper demonstrates that race is not the only explanatory variable that has significant impacts in multivariate modelsthe student's academic interest has significant impacts on thoughts about natural hazards, disconnection, predators, human-made hazards, and loathsome or hateful places. Gender, age, parental education, and first-generation college attendance also has significant impacts on the dependent variables.
机译:尽管存在研究人与自然联系的强大研究机构,但很少有学者研究人们在思考自然时倾向于思考的问题。该研究的目的是找出大学生如何看待自然。该研究还试图确定哪些因素对影响学生对自然的看法最重要。本文分析了大学生思考自然的方式中的种族,性别,阶级和学术差异。对287名美国学生的研究发现,受访者在考虑自然时会想到各种各样的概念。本文关注的是关于恐惧,危险和厌恶的人口统计学差异。这套思想一直是学术研究的主题,在此提出的发现有助于这一学术体系。本文讨论了用于探讨该主题的描述性技术和多元技术。该研究发现,白人学生比种族/族裔少数群体在考虑大自然时,更不容易考虑脱节,掠食者,迷路,令人讨厌或可憎的地方,恐惧和危险。但是,结果还表明,将种族/族裔少数民族描述为普遍惧怕大自然并与大自然脱节是不正确的。此外,本文证明种族不是对多元模型有重大影响的唯一解释变量,学生的学术兴趣对以下方面的思想具有重大影响:自然灾害,脱节,天敌,人为灾害以及讨厌或讨厌的地方。性别,年龄,父母的教育程度和第一代大学出勤率也对因变量产生重大影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2019年第1期|79-96|共18页
  • 作者

    Taylor Dorceta E.;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Connectedness; Disconnection; Whites; Blacks; ASIANS; LatinX;

    机译:关联;断开连接;白人;黑人;亚洲人;拉丁克斯;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:29:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号