A federal district judge in Indiana granted summary judgment in favor of Duke Energy Sept. 14, ruling an environmental group filed its lawsuit after the statute of limitations expired, but she stayed the decision pending a ruling by an appeals court on a similarrnissue (Sierra Club v. Duke Energy Indiana Inc., S.D. Ind., No. 08-00437, 9/14/10).rnJudge Sarah Evans Barker of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana ruled that the five-year statute of limitations had expired when the Sierra Club filed a lawsuit in 2008 alleging Duke Energy had modified its Edwardsport Generating Station in Knox County, Ind., between 1993 and 2001 without obtaining the necessary prevention of significant deterioration permits.
展开▼
机译:印第安纳州的一名联邦地方法官于9月14日做出了对杜克能源公司有利的简易判决,裁定环保组织在诉讼时效期满后提起诉讼,但她保留了该决定,等待上诉法院对类似案件的裁决(Sierra Club v。Duke Energy Indiana Inc.,SD Ind。,No. 08-00437,9/14/10).rn印第安纳州南区美国地方法院的Sarah Evans Barker法官裁定五年时效条例Sierra俱乐部于2008年提起诉讼,称杜克能源公司(Duke Energy)在1993年至2001年间修改了位于印第安纳州诺克斯县的Edwardsport发电站,但未获得必要的防止显着恶化许可证的许可,该合同到期。
展开▼