首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >'Bad Faith' Superfund Action Reopened After Fireman's Fund Wins Challenge
【24h】

'Bad Faith' Superfund Action Reopened After Fireman's Fund Wins Challenge

机译:消防员基金赢得挑战后,“不良信念”超级基金行动重新开始

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A Superfund suit was pursued in bad faith and a default judgment must be vacated, because the action was filed without notice to the bankrupt defendant's insurer, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled July 2 (Dave Drilling Envtl. Eng'g, Inc. v. Gamblin, 2015 BL 214350, N.D. Cal., No. 14-cv-02851, 7/2/15). Dave Drilling Environmental Engineering Inc. "likely acted in bad faith" in filing a second cost recovery action against Margaret Gamblin under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, Liability Act and concealing it from her insurer, Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., the court said.
机译:超级基金的诉讼是出于恶意,因此必须撤销缺席判决,因为该诉讼是在未通知破产被告的保险人的情况下提起的,加利福尼亚北区美国地方法院于7月2日裁定(Dave Drilling Envtl。Eng'g ,Inc.诉Gamblin,2015 BL 214350,ND Cal。,No.14-cv-02851,7/2/15)。法院说,戴夫钻探环境工程公司(Dave Drilling Environmental Engineering Inc.)“很可能出于恶意”,根据《全面环境响应,赔偿,责任法》对玛格丽特·甘布林(Margaret Gamblin)提起第二次成本回收诉讼,并向其保险人Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.隐藏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号