首页> 外文期刊>Environment & Behavior >Who Leaves and Who Stays? A Review and Statistical Meta-Analysis of Hurricane Evacuation Studies
【24h】

Who Leaves and Who Stays? A Review and Statistical Meta-Analysis of Hurricane Evacuation Studies

机译:谁离开,谁留下?飓风疏散研究的回顾与统计Meta分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This statistical meta-analysis (SMA) examined 38 studies involving actual responses to hurricane warnings and 11 studies involving expected responses to hypothetical hurricane scenarios conducted since 1991. The results indicate official warnings, mobile home residence, risk area residence, observations of environmental (storm conditions) and social (other people's behavior) cues, and expectations of severe personal impacts, all have consistently significant effects on household evacuation. Other variablesespecially demographic variableshave weaker effects on evacuation, perhaps via indirect effects. Finally, the SMA also indicates that the effect sizes from actual hurricane evacuation studies are similar to those from studies of hypothetical hurricane scenarios for 10 of 17 variables that were examined. These results can be used to guide the design of hurricane evacuation transportation analyses and emergency managers' warning programs. They also suggest that laboratory and Internet experiments could be used to examine people's cognitive processing of different types of hurricane warning messages.
机译:这项统计荟萃分析(SMA)对1991年以来进行的38项涉及飓风警告的实际反应和11项涉及对假设飓风情景的预期反应的研究进行了调查。结果表明,官方警告,活动房屋住所,危险区域住所,环境观测(暴风雨)情况和社会(其他人的行为)线索,以及对严重个人影响的期望,对家庭疏散始终具有重大影响。其他变量,尤其是人口统计学变量,可能通过间接影响而对撤离的影响较小。最后,SMA还指出,实际飓风疏散研究的效果大小与所检查的17个变量中的10个假设飓风情景研究的效果大小相似。这些结果可用于指导飓风疏散运输分析的设计和应急管理人员的预警程序。他们还建议实验室和互联网实验可用于检查人们对不同类型飓风警告消息的认知处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号