首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >The possible experts: how epistemic communities negotiate barriers to knowledge use in ecosystems services policy
【24h】

The possible experts: how epistemic communities negotiate barriers to knowledge use in ecosystems services policy

机译:可能的专家:认知社区如何协商生态系统服务政策中知识使用的障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The increased salience of how to value ecosystems services has driven up the demand for policy-relevant knowledge. It is clear that advice by epistemic communities can show up in policy outcomes, yet little systematic analysis exists prescribing how this can actually be achieved. This paper draws on four decades of knowledge utilisation research to propose four types of 'possible expert' who might be influential on ecosystems services. Broad findings of a literature review on knowledge use in public policy are reported, and the four-fold conceptualisation pioneered by Carol Weiss that defines the literature is outlined. The field is then systematised by placing these four modes of knowledge use within an explanatory typology of policy learning. With how, when, and why experts and their knowledge are likely to show up in policy outcomes established, the paper then proposes the boundaries of the possible in how the ecosystems services epistemic community might navigate the challenges associated with each learning mode. Four possible experts emerge: with political antenna and epistemic humility; with the ability to speak locally and early to the hearts and minds of citizens; with a willingness to advocate policy; and, finally, with an enhanced institutional awareness and peripheral policy vision. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the utility of the analysis.
机译:如何珍惜生态系统服务的重要性日益凸显,从而推动了对与政策相关知识的需求。很明显,认知团体的建议可以在政策成果中体现出来,但是很少有系统的分析说明如何实际实现。本文基于四十年的知识利用研究,提出了可能对生态系统服务产生影响的四种类型的“可能专家”。报告了有关公共政策中知识使用的文献综述的广泛发现,并概述了由Carol Weiss提出的定义文献的四个概念。然后,通过将这四种知识使用模式置于政策学习的解释类型中,来对该领域进行系统化。关于如何以及何时以及为什么专家及其知识很可能出现在已建立的政策成果中,然后提出了生态系统服务认知社区如何应对与每种学习模式相关的挑战的可能性的界限。出现了四位可能的专家:具有政治触角和认知谦逊;有能力在本地和尽早地向公民的心灵说话;愿意倡导政策;最后,增强了机构意识和外围政策视野。本文最后简要分析了分析的实用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号