首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >High Court Agrees To Hear Suit Over Agencies' Power To Re-Interpret Rules
【24h】

High Court Agrees To Hear Suit Over Agencies' Power To Re-Interpret Rules

机译:高等法院同意听取有关机构重新解释规则的权力的诉讼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Supreme Court has agreed to review an appellate ruling that would require EPA and other agencies to follow notice-and-comment procedures when they amend interpretations of their rules, a case that could create procedural difficulties for the Obama administration's rule exempting certain farm practices from Clean Water Act (CWA) permits. In June 16 orders, the justices accepted certiorari in the linked cases Thomas Perez, et al. v. Mortgage Banking Association (MBA), et al. and Nichols, et al. v. MBA, et al, which test whether agencies must follow notice-and-comment rulemaking to revise their existing interpretations of rules. The court will hear the case in late 2014 or early 2015, with a decision to follow potentially as soon as 2-3 months after arguments.
机译:最高法院已同意审查一项上诉裁决,该裁决将要求EPA和其他机构在修改其规则的解释时遵循通知和评论程序,此案可能给奥巴马政府的规则造成程序上的困难,从而使某些农场做法免于执行清洁水法(CWA)允许。在6月16日的命令中,大法官在Thomas Perez等人的关联案件中接受了证明。诉抵押银行协会(MBA)等。和Nichols等人。 v。MBA等人,它测试了代理机构是否必须遵循通知和评论规则制定方法来修改其现有规则解释。法院将在2014年末或2015年初审理此案,并决定可能在争执后2-3个月内立即进行跟踪。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号