首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Optimal design of redundant structural systems: fundamentals
【24h】

Optimal design of redundant structural systems: fundamentals

机译:冗余结构系统的优化设计:基础知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In spite of extended recent interest in System Reliability -Based Design Optimization (System RBDO) and life - cycle cost or Risk Optimization (RO), there is a lack of published studies on optimal design of redundant hy- perstatic systems with objective consideration of (a) progressive collapse and (b) the impact of epistemic un- certainties. This paper investigates the fundamental aspects of the problem, by addressing the optimal design of simple two -bar active and passive redundant systems. Progressive collapse is objectively addressed, differ- entiating consequences of direct collapse of statically determinate structures, and progressive collapse of re- dundant, statically indeterminate structures. A comprehensive study is performed, considering material post - failure behavior (fragile -ductile), strength correlation, dynamic amplification factors in load re -distribution, and material strength ratios. Physical uncertainty in material strengths and loads is considered. However, it is well known that reliability of a structural system also depends on nonstructural factors, or factors beyond structural design, such as unanticipated loading, manufacturing quality, quality of workmanship and human errors. These factors can be taken into account in an encompassing risk analysis, which accounts for physical and epistemic uncertainties, and which contributes a fixed latent failure probability to the structural optimization problem. Results presented herein show that the latent failure probability is the single most important parameter in determining optimal solutions, in System RBDO and in RO solutions. When the latent failure probability is smaller than target (System RBDO) or optimal (RO) failure probabilities, there is an equivalence between re- dundant and non -redundant (hyperstatic and isostatic) designs. However, when the latent reliability is smaller than target or optimal reliabilities, optimal designs become necessarily redundant (hyperstatic); as the only way to make system reliability larger than the latent reliability is by making structural systems redundant. This result is widely known in context of system reliability, but has been overlooked in past studies involving structural System RBDO and Risk Optimization.
机译:尽管近期对系统可靠性的兴趣进行了扩展,但基于设计优化(系统RBDO)和生命周期成本或风险优化(RO),但缺乏关于具有客观考虑的冗余卫生系统的最佳设计研究( a)逐步崩溃和(b)认知的不确定的影响。本文通过解决简单的两个-Bar主动和被动冗余系统的最佳设计来调查问题的基本方面。渐进崩溃是客观地解决的,不同地指定静态确定结构的直接崩溃的后果,以及重新损失,静态静止的结构的逐步崩溃。考虑综合研究,考虑物质失败行为(易碎 - 磁性),强度相关性,负载重新分布中的动态放大因子和材料强度比。考虑了材料强度和负荷的物理不确定性。然而,众所周知,结构系统的可靠性也取决于非结构因素,或超出结构设计的因素,例如意想不到的装载,制造质量,工艺质量和人为错误。这些因素可以在包围的风险分析中考虑,这涉及身体和认知的不确定性,这导致结构优化问题的固定失败概率。这里提出的结果表明,潜在故障概率是在系统RBDO和RO解决方案中确定最佳解决方案的单一最重要参数。当潜在故障概率小于目标(系统RBDO)或最佳(RO)失效概率时,重新冗余和非度过(虚空等静态)设计之间存在等价。然而,当潜在的可靠性小于目标或最佳的可靠性时,最佳设计必须是多余的(高层);作为使系统可靠性大于潜在可靠性的唯一方法是通过使结构系统冗余。该结果在系统可靠性的背景下广泛着名,但在过去的研究中被忽略了涉及结构系统RBDO和风险优化的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号