...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >The benefit of regional diversification of cogeneration investments in Europe: A mean-variance portfolio analysis
【24h】

The benefit of regional diversification of cogeneration investments in Europe: A mean-variance portfolio analysis

机译:欧洲热电联产投资区域多元化的好处:均值方差投资组合分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The EU Directive 2004/8/EC, concerning the promotion of cogeneration, established principles on how EU member states can support combined heat and power generation (CHP). Up to now, the implementation of these principles into national law has not been uniform, and has led to the adoption of different promotion schemes for CHP across the EU member states. In this paper, we first give an overview of the promotion schemes for CHP in various European countries. In a next step, we take two standard CHP technologies, combined-cycle gas turbines (CCGT-CHP) and engine-CHP, and apply exemplarily four selected support mechanisms used in the four largest European energy markets: feed-in tariffs in Germany; energy efficiency certificates in Italy; benefits through tax reduction in the UK; and purchase obligations for power from CHP generation in France. For contracting companies, it could be of interest to diversify their investment in new CHP facilities regionally over several countries in order to reduce country and regulatory risk. By applying the Mean-Variance Portfolio (MVP) theory, we derive characteristic return-risk profiles of the selected CHP technologies in different countries. The results show that the returns on CHP investments differ significantly depending on the country, the support scheme, and the selected technology studied. While a regional diversification of investments in CCGT-CHP does not contribute to reducing portfolio risks, a diversification of investments in engine-CHP can decrease the risk exposure.
机译:关于促进热电联产的欧盟指令2004/8 / EC建立了有关欧盟成员国如何支持热电联产(CHP)的原则。到目前为止,这些原则在国内法中的实施还不是统一的,并导致在整个欧盟成员国采用不同的CHP促进计划。在本文中,我们首先概述了欧洲各个国家的CHP推广计划。下一步,我们采用两种标准的CHP技术,即联合循环燃气轮机(CCGT-CHP)和发动机CHP,并示例性地应用在四个欧洲最大能源市场中使用的四种选定的支持机制:德国的上网电价;意大利的能效证书;英国减税带来的好处;并从法国的热电联产购买电力。对于签约公司而言,可能有兴趣的是,在多个国家/地区对他们在新的热电联产设施中的投资进行多元化,以降低国家和监管风险。通过应用均值方差投资组合(MVP)理论,我们得出了不同国家所选CHP技术的特征回报风险曲线。结果表明,根据国家,支持计划和所选技术的不同,热电联产投资的回报差异很大。虽然CCGT-CHP的区域投资多元化不会有助于降低投资组合风险,但发动机CHP的投资多元化可以降低风险敞口。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2010年第12期|p.7911-7920|共10页
  • 作者单位

    E.ON Energy Projects GmbH, Amulfstrasse 56, 80335 Munich. Germany;

    Institute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), Faculty of Business and Economics/E.ON Energy Research Center. RWTH Aachen University, Mathieustrasse 6, 52074 Aachen, Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    combined heat and power; CHP promotion scheme; portfolio optimization;

    机译:热电联产;热电联产推广计划;投资组合优化;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号