首页> 外文期刊>The Electronic Library >The assortativity of scholars at a research-intensive university in Malaysia
【24h】

The assortativity of scholars at a research-intensive university in Malaysia

机译:马来西亚研究型大学中学者的多样性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this study was to provide quantitative indicators of intra-university assortative mixing patterns of scholars based on five parameters: degree of connections, faculty, professional position, gender and race. Design/methodology/approach - We conducted a case study of business and management scholars of University of Malaya, a research-intensive University in Malaysia, using co-authorship in papers indexed in the Digital Library Indexing System, Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) database of Web of Science, from 2006 to 2010. Background information of scholars was extracted from bibliometric records, online curriculum vitaes and other online sources. Assortativity coefficients were calculated for all parameters. Findings - The study found a degree assortativity coefficient of 0.195, which corresponds with other studies in the literature. Assortativity due to university faculty was strongly assortative at 0.649, whereas gender (0.28) and race (0.16) were weakly assortative. However, in contrast to the common belief that "similarity breeds connection", the scholars were highly disassortative by professional position (-0.75). Practical implications - This study holds significance to policymakers in understanding the socio-academic factors that bring scholars together. It also adds to the body of knowledge in social network studies that are examining the various factors responsible in bringing the actors together. Originality/value - This is one of the first studies that empirically investigated mixing patterns of researchers at a prominent research-intensive university in Malaysia.
机译:目的-这项研究的目的是基于联系程度,师资,职业,性别和种族这五个参数,为大学内部学者的混合模式提供量化指标。设计/方法论/方法-我们对马来西亚研究型大学马来亚大学的商业和管理学者进行了案例研究,并在数字图书馆索引系统,社会科学引文索引(SSCI)中进行了索引2006年至2010年,是Web of Science的数据库。学者的背景信息是从文献计量记录,在线履历和其他在线资源中提取的。计算所有参数的分类系数。研究结果-该研究发现度分类系数为0.195,与文献中的其他研究相对应。大学教职员工的分类能力很强,为0.649,而性别(0.28)和种族(0.16)的能力很弱。但是,与“相似性会促进联系”这一普遍信念相反,学者们在专业地位上却存在很大差异(-0.75)。实际意义-这项研究对于决策者了解将学者聚集在一起的社会学术因素具有重要意义。它还增加了社交网络研究中的知识体系,这些研究正在研究将参与者聚集在一起的各种因素。原创性/价值-这是对马来西亚著名的研究型大学的研究人员混合模式进行实证研究的第一批研究之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号