首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices >Comparative physical and electrical metrology of ultrathin oxides in the 6 to 1.5 nm regime
【24h】

Comparative physical and electrical metrology of ultrathin oxides in the 6 to 1.5 nm regime

机译:6至1.5 nm态超薄氧化物的比较物理和电气计量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this work, five methods for measuring the thickness of ultra-thin gate oxide layers in MOS structures were compared experimentally on n/sup +/ poly-SiO/sub 2/-p-Si structures. Three methods are based on electrical capacitance-voltage (C-V) and current-voltage (I-V) data and the other two methods are HRTEM and optical measurement. MOS capacitors with oxide thickness in the range 17-55 /spl Aring/ have been used in this study. We found that thickness extracted using QM C-V and HRTEM agree within 1.0 /spl Aring/ over the whole thickness range when a dielectric constant of 3.9 was used. Comparison between thickness extracted using quantum interference (QI) I-V technique and optical measurement were also within 1.0 /spl Aring/ for thickness 31-47 /spl Aring/. However, optical oxide thickness was consistently lower than the TEM thickness by about 2 /spl Aring/ over the thickness range under consideration. Both optical measurement and QM C-V modeling yield the same thickness as the nominal oxide thickness increases (<50 /spl Aring/).
机译:在这项工作中,在n / sup + // poly-SiO2 / sub 2 / -p-Si结构上实验比较了五种测量MOS结构中超薄栅氧化层厚度的方法。三种方法基于电容-电压(C-V)和电流-电压(I-V)数据,另外两种方法是HRTEM和光学测量。这项研究中使用了氧化物厚度在17-55 / spl Aring /范围内的MOS电容器。我们发现,当使用介电常数3.9时,在整个厚度范围内,使用QM C-V和HRTEM提取的厚度在1.0 / spl Aring /之内。对于厚度为31-47 / spl Aring /,使用量子干涉(QI)I-V技术提取的厚度与光学测量值之间的比较也在1.0 / spl Aring /之内。然而,在所考虑的厚度范围内,光学氧化物厚度始终比TEM厚度低约2 / spl Aring /。光学测量和QM C-V建模均可产生与标称氧化物厚度增加相同的厚度(<50 / spl Aring /)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号