首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION AS PHILOSOPHY: A METAPHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY
【24h】

PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION AS PHILOSOPHY: A METAPHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY

机译:作为哲学的教育哲学:一种哲学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

What is the philosophical status of the philosophy of education? Is it philosophy, no different from the philosophy of science and the philosophy of mind? Much depends on where these latter derive their philosophical bona fides from. There are two ways of viewing the matter. On one account, they are subdivisions of the veritable philosophy branches of metaphysics and epistemology. It being impossible to view philosophy of education as comparably emanating from any of the philosophical originals, this approach effectively deprives it of proper philosophical standing. On the other account, nonoriginal philosophy branches may be viewed as attaining philnsophihood, each on its own. Such a purview provides the maneuverability needed to countenance the philosophical nature of philosophy of education as well. Still, George Pollack argues in this essay that if it is to fully accommodate philosophy of education, philosophy will need to be reconceived to include the unearthing of the philosophical foundations of a social practice.
机译:教育哲学的哲学地位是什么?是哲学,与科学哲学和心灵哲学没有什么不同吗?这些在很大程度上取决于后者从何处获得其哲学上的真诚。有两种查看问题的方式。一方面,它们是形而上学和认识论的确凿的哲学分支的细分。不可能将教育哲学视为源于任何一种哲学原始思想,这种方法实际上剥夺了它应有的哲学地位。另一方面,非原创性的哲学分支可以被视为获得哲学性,每个都独立存在。这样的权限也提供了尊重教育哲学的哲学本质所需的可操作性。尽管如此,乔治·波拉克(George Pollack)在本文中认为,如果要完全容纳教育哲学,就必须重新构想哲学,以包括社会实践的哲学基础的发掘。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Theory》 |2007年第3期|p.239-260|共22页
  • 作者

    George Pollack;

  • 作者单位

    Long Island University, CW Post Campus, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, 720 Northern Blvd., Brookville, NY 11548;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:20:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号