首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >DEWEY, ECOLOGY, AND EDUCATION: HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY DEBATES OVER DEWEY'S NATURALISM AND (TRANSACTIONAL) REALISM
【24h】

DEWEY, ECOLOGY, AND EDUCATION: HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY DEBATES OVER DEWEY'S NATURALISM AND (TRANSACTIONAL) REALISM

机译:杜威,生态学和教育:关于杜威自然主义和(交易性)现实主义的历史和当代辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the early 1970s, Thomas Colwell argued for an "ecological basis [for] human community." He suggested that "naturalistic transactionalism" was being put forward by some ecologists and some philosophers of education, but independently of each other. He suspected that ecologists were working on their own versions of naturalistic transactionalism independently of John Dewey. In this essay, Deron Boyles examines Colwell's central claim as well as his lament as a starting point for a larger inquiry into Dewey's thought. Boyles explores the following questions: First, was and is there a dearth of literature regarding Dewey as an ecological philosopher? Second, if a literature exists, what does it say? Should Dewey be seen as biocentric, anthropocentric, or something else entirely? Finally, of what importance are the terms and concepts in understanding and, as a result, determining Dewey's ecological thought in relation to education?
机译:1970年代初期,托马斯·科威尔(Thomas Colwell)提出了“人类社区的生态基础”的主张。他认为,一些生态学家和一些教育哲学家正在提出“自然主义的交易主义”,但它们彼此独立。他怀疑生态学家正在独立于约翰·杜威而从事他们自己的自然主义交易主义版本的研究。在本文中,德隆·博伊尔斯(Deron Boyles)研究了科尔威尔(Colwell)的中心主张以及他的哀叹,以此作为对杜威思想进行更大范围质询的起点。博伊尔斯探讨了以下问题:首先,关于杜威是生态哲学家的文献是否存在并且缺乏?第二,如果存在文学,它怎么说?杜威应该被视为以生物为中心,以人类为中心,还是完全以其他方式被视为?最后,在理解和确定杜威的教育生态思想中,术语和概念的重要性是什么?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Theory》 |2012年第2期|p.143-161|共19页
  • 作者

    Deron Boyles;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Educational Policy Studies Georgia State University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:19:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号