首页> 外文期刊>The economist >The California raisin grab
【24h】

The California raisin grab

机译:加州葡萄干抢

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Marvin Horne, a raisin grower in Fresno, California, is apparently the first family farmer to have his case accepted twice by America's Supreme Court. Horne v US Department of Agriculture, which the justices re-heard on April 22nd (having previously ruled that a lower court could not duck hearing it) challenges a rule dating back to 1937. The rule requires raisin farmers to hand over a share of their crop to the government, which may or may not pay for it. For nearly three decades, Mr Home and his wife Laura complied. But just over a decade ago they rebelled and were hit with fines of nearly $700,000. In 2003-04 they would have had to fork over 30% of their crop and receive nothing in return. To them, this looked like theft.
机译:加利福尼亚州弗雷斯诺市的葡萄干种植者马文·霍恩(Marvin Horne)显然是第一个被美国最高法院两次接受此案的家庭农民。霍恩诉美国农业部一案,法官于4月22日重新审理(此前曾裁定下级法院不能接受该裁决)对一项始于1937年的规则提出了质疑。该规则要求葡萄干农民交出一部分收割给政府,这可能会也可能不会。近三十年来,霍姆先生和他的妻子劳拉(Laura)遵守了规定。但是就在十多年前,他们叛逆,并被罚款近70万美元。在2003-04年度,他们将不得不收获超过30%的农作物,却得不到任何回报。对他们来说,这看起来像是盗窃。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2015年第8935期|30-30|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:28:23

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号