首页> 外文期刊>Early Childhood Education Journal >Process or Product? The Argument for Aesthetic Exploration in the Early Years
【24h】

Process or Product? The Argument for Aesthetic Exploration in the Early Years

机译:工艺还是产品?早年的审美探索之争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Early childhood educators often deliberate the difference between the use of arts versus crafts in the classroom as learning opportunities. This paper discusses the distinct differences between the two and how encouraging young children to engage within art making provides great opportunity for personal and communal exploration, expression, and discussion. Open-ended activities that focus on the process, and not necessarily the end product, provide children with authentic, differentiated, and holistic methods of exploration and learning. Fostering a willingness to creatively engage within an aesthetic problem-solving process that allows children to select, represent, and explain their thoughts and actions will help them develop skills necessary for success in an unknown future.
机译:幼儿教育者通常会在教室中将艺术与手工艺的使用作为学习机会加以区别。本文讨论了两者之间的明显差异,以及如何鼓励幼儿参与艺术创作为个人和社区的探索,表达和讨论提供了巨大的机会。不限成员名额的活动侧重于过程,而不一定是最终产品,为孩子们提供了真实,有区别的整体探索和学习方法。培养乐于创造性地参与解决美学问题的过程的意愿,该过程允许孩子选择,代表和解释他们的思想和行为,这将帮助他们发展在未知的未来取得成功所必需的技能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号