首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Biomedical Engineering >Evaluating the presence of software-as-a-medical-device in FDA registrations
【24h】

Evaluating the presence of software-as-a-medical-device in FDA registrations

机译:评估FDA注册中的软件 - AS-A-Medical-Device的存在

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Software as a medical device (SaMD) has gained the attention of medical device regulatory bodies as the prospects of standalone software for use in diagnositic and therapeutic settings have increased. However, to date, figures related to SaMD have not been made available by regulators, which limits the understanding of how prevalent these devices are and what actions should be taken to regulate them. Objective The aim of this study is to empirically evaluate the market approvals and clearances related to SaMD and identify adverse incidents related to these devices. Methods Using databases managed by the US medical device regulator, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), we identified the counts of SaMD registered with the FDA since 2016 through the use of product codes, mapped the path SaMD takes toward classification, and recorded adverse events. Results SaMD does not seem to be registered at a rate dissimilar to that of other medical devices; thus, adverse events for SaMD only comprise a small portion of the total reported number. Conclusions Although SaMD has been identified in the literature as an area of development, our analysis suggests that this growth has been modest. These devices are overwhelmingly classified as moderate to high risk, and they take a very particular path to that classification. The digital revolution in health care is less pronounced when evidence related to SaMD is considered. In general, the addition of SaMD to the medical device market seems to mimic that of other medical devices.
机译:背景技术作为医疗设备(SAMD)的软件已经获得了医疗器械监管机构的注意,因为独立软件用于诊断和治疗设置的独立软件的前景增加。然而,迄今为止,监管机构尚未提供与SAMD相关的数字,这限制了对这些设备的普遍性以及应采取哪些行动来调节它们的理解。目的本研究的目的是经验评估与SAMD相关的市场批准和许可,并确定与这些设备相关的不利事件。方法使用美国医疗器械监管机构,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)管理的数据库,我们通过使用产品代码自2016年以来,通过使用产品代码来确定为FDA注册的SAMD的计数,映射了路径SAMD对分类,并记录不良事件。结果SAMD似乎并未以与其他医疗设备的速度相提并论;因此,SAMD的不良事件仅包括总报告数量的一小部分。结论虽然SAMD已在文献中被确定为一个发展领域,但我们的分析表明这种增长是适度的。这些设备压倒性地被归类为中度至高风险,并且他们对该分类的途径非常特定的道路。当考虑与SAMD有关的证据时,医疗保健中的数字革命不太明显。通常,向医疗器械市场添加SAMD似乎模仿其他医疗设备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号