...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >A new method for testing reproducibility in systematic reviews was developed, but needs more testing
【24h】

A new method for testing reproducibility in systematic reviews was developed, but needs more testing

机译:制定了一种新的系统评论再现性的新方法,但需要更多的测试

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To develop and test an approach to test reproducibility of SRs. Case study. We have developed an approach to test reproducibility retrospectively while focusing on the whole conduct of an SR instead of single steps of it. We replicated the literature searches and drew a 25% random sample followed by study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias (ROB) assessments performed by two reviewers independently. These results were compared narratively with the original review. We were not able to fully reproduce the original search resulting in minor differences in the number of citations retrieved. The biggest disagreements were found in study selection. The most difficult section to be reproduced was the RoB assessment due to the lack of reporting clear criteria to support the judgement of RoB ratings, although agreement was still found to be satisfactory. Our approach as well as other approaches needs to undergo testing and comparison in the future as the area of testing for reproducibility of SRs is still in its infancy.
机译:开发和测试一种测试SRS再现性的方法。案例分析。我们已经开发了一种回顾性测试再现性的方法,同时专注于SR的整个行为而不是单一步骤。我们复制了文献搜索,并绘制了25%的随机样品,然后独立地研究了两名审稿员进行的选择,数据提取和偏见(Rob)评估的风险。这些结果与原始审查进行了讨论。我们无法完全重现原始搜索,导致检索的引文数量的微小差异。学习选择中发现了最大的分歧。虽然仍然被发现仍然被发现,缺乏报告罗伯评级判决的明确标准缺乏报告明确标准,但仍有最困难的部分是抢劫评估。我们的方法以及其他方法需要在未来进行测试和比较,因为SRS再现性的测试领域仍处于起步性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号