首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Impact of Educational Programme on Inhalational Device Usage Techniques among the Patients Suffering from Asthma
【24h】

Impact of Educational Programme on Inhalational Device Usage Techniques among the Patients Suffering from Asthma

机译:教育计划对哮喘患者吸入装置使用技术的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Aerosol inhalation is a mode of drug administration used in the management of asthma. Improper inhaler device usage techniques can lead to suboptimal therapeutic effect. Patients are very often prescribed inhaler devices without proper instructions regarding the correct usage technique, because the provider themselves may not be aware of the same.Aim: To compare the techniques of inhalational devices usage before and after training the patients suffering from asthma.Materials and Methods: An institution-based, prospective study was conducted among asthmatics attending the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India, from March 2020 - September 2020. Asthmatic patients who met diagnostic criteria recommended by Global INitiative for Asthma (GINA), who were on inhaler devices namely: pressurised Meter Dose Inhaler (pMDI), pMDI with spacer, Rotahaler??, and Revolizer??, and who consented to be part of the study were included in the present study. The sample size was calculated as 223, but 249 subject were included in the study. Ethical clearance was obtained prior to the study. Each patient was advised to use the inhaler medication, during which the patient was observed, and the checklist was scored. Subsequently patients were educated regarding the correct, device specific usage technique with demonstration. After one month (post-training visit), using the same checklist, each patient was re-evaluated. For each correct step, the patient received a score of “one” whereas each incorrect step, as well as “no-response” was valued as “zero”. The sum of the scores for all the steps was calculated for each patient and each type of inhaler. The Microsoft Excel 2010 spreadsheet was used to enter the data. Descriptive statistics were represented using percentages, frequencies, graphs and in the form of tables. Mean Difference was used to compare the scores before and after the training. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The scores were categorised into “Handling Errors” and “Inhalational Errors”, percentage of participants committing at least one error, handling and inhalational error was tabulated.Results: Prior to the training all the subjects using pMDI and pMDI with spacer were unable to complete all the steps appropriately. Whereas 7.8% of patients (4/51) using Rotahaler??, 4.5% of patients (2/44) using Revolizer?? were able to perform all the steps accurately. During post-training follow-up, 59.22% (61/103) and 39.21% (20/51) patients using pMDI and pMDI with spacer respectively were able to perform all the steps accurately. Whereas 50.98% (26/51) and 72.72% (32/44) patients using Rotahaler?? and Revolizer??, respectively, were able to perform all the steps accurately.Conclusion: The majority of the asthmatics erred while utilising the inhaler devices, errors were committed both during handling and inhalational steps. When trained, the error percentage was reduced significantly.
机译:雾化吸入是在哮喘的管理中使用的药物的给药模式。不当的吸入器装置使用的技术可以导致次优的治疗作用。患者经常吸入规定不遵守有关正确使用技术适当的指示装置,因为供应商本身可能不知道的same.Aim的:之前和培训从asthma.Materials痛苦患者比较后吸入装置使用的技术和方法:一个机构为基础,前瞻性研究,主治肺医学,迈索尔医学院和研究所,迈索尔,印度卡纳塔克邦,系从2020年三月哮喘患者进行 - 2020年九月哮喘患者谁见了由全球倡议推荐的诊断标准哮喘(GINA),谁是在吸入器装置,即:加压仪表剂量吸入器(PMDI),用的pMDI间隔,ROTAHALER ??,和Revolizer ??,谁同意成为研究的一部分被包括在本研究中。样本量计算为223,但249课题被列入研究。道德清除之前的研究获得。每位患者被告知使用该吸入器的药物,在此期间观察到患者,并且该清单进行评分。随后患者被关于与示范正确的,设备的具体使用技术教育。一个月(后培训考察)之后,使用相同的清单,每位患者重新评估。对于每个正确的步骤,患者接收的得分“一”,而每个不正确的步骤,以及“无应答”的被评价为“零”。的分数的所有步骤的总和计算每个患者和各类型的吸入器。微软的Excel电子表格2010来输入数据。描述性统计使用百分比,频率图形和以表的形式表示。平均差为使用前和培训后的成绩进行比较。 p值<0.05被认为是统计学显著。分数被分为“处理错误”和“吸入性错误”,与会者提交至少一个错误,处理和吸入误差tabulated.Results的百分比:在此之前的所有训练用的pMDI和pMDI的发生间隔物的受试者无法完成适当的所有步骤。而使用ROTAHALER患者(4/51)7.8%??,使用Revolizer患者(2/44)4.5%??能够准确地执行所有步骤。在培训后的随访,59.22%(61/103)和39.21%(51分之20)患者使用的pMDI和pMDI的使用间隔分别能够准确地执行所有步骤。而50.98%(26/51)和72.72%使用ROTAHALER(32/44)的患者?和Revolizer ??,分别能够执行所有步骤accurately.Conclusion:大多数哮喘患者的犯错而利用吸入装置,错误处理和吸入步骤中都致力于两者。当训练有素,误差百分比显著减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号