首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients
【24h】

The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients

机译:通过处理问卷评估的三种吸入装置对哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的教育培训的经济影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The usability of inhalation devices depends on several factors, eg, the drug to inhale, device handling, and patients’ training. Usability is then presumed to have economic consequences. Aim: To assess and compare the cost of patients’ training for proper usability of Breezhaler and Genuair (both dry powder inhalers) and Respimat (a soft mist inhaler) in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) outpatients. Methods: The acceptance and handling of the three devices were investigated by means of the Handling Questionnaire. The time spent in specific training for ensuring a proper actuation and the corresponding costs were also calculated. Linear and logistic regressions were used in order to investigate the factors influencing proper handling of the devices. A significance level of P <0.05 was accepted. Results: According to both the patients’ and the nurse’s judgments, Genuair and Respimat were perceived as the easiest devices to use, while Breezhaler required the highest number of attempts for achieving the first proper actuation (2.6 vs 1.6; P <0.0001). The total training cost per patient (including the nurse’s time for demonstration and that for attending the patients’ maneuvers) was €1.38±€1.21. Breezhaler was found to be the most expensive as the cost per patient was €2.35±€1.26, which was three to four times higher than that of Genuair and Respimat (both devices involved a cost of ,€1 per patient, with negligible differences between each other). Asthma and COPD patients showed a similar trend, with better outcomes reported for asthma patients probably due to lower age. Conclusion: Substantial differences were found to exist in patients’ acceptability and handling of the three devices. The economic impact of specific training was also different and strictly related to the comprehension of the procedure for actuation of each device. Respimat as a soft mist inhaler and Genuair as an metered-dose inhaler proved to be the most convenient in economic terms also.
机译:背景:吸入装置的可用性取决于多种因素,例如吸入药物,装置操作和患者的培训。然后假定可用性会带来经济后果。目的:评估和比较患者在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)门诊患者中使用Breezhaler和Genuair(均为干粉吸入器)和Respimat(软雾吸入器)的适当培训费用。方法:通过处理问卷调查了这三种设备的接受和处理情况。还计算了为确保正确操作而在特定培训中花费的时间以及相应的费用。为了研究影响设备正确处理的因素,使用了线性和逻辑回归。接受显着性水平P <0.05。结果:根据患者和护士的判断,Genuair和Respimat被认为是最容易使用的设备,而Breezhaler要求进行首次正确操作的尝试次数最多(2.6 vs 1.6; P <0.0001)。每位患者的总培训费用(包括护士的演示时间和参加患者操作的时间)为1.38欧元±1.21欧元。 Breezhaler被认为是最昂贵的,因为每位患者的费用为€2.35±€1.26,比Genuair和Respimat的费用高三到四倍(两种设备的费用均为每位患者€1,两者之间的差异可忽略不计彼此)。哮喘和COPD患者的趋势相似,哮喘患者的年龄可能较低,因此预后较好。结论:发现患者对这三种装置的可接受性和操作存在很大差异。专门培训的经济影响也有所不同,并且与对每个设备致动程序的理解严格相关。从经济角度来看,Respimat作为软雾吸入器,Genuair作为定量吸入器也是最方便的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号