首页> 外文期刊>Human reproduction open. >The ethics of preconception expanded carrier screening in patients seeking assisted reproduction
【24h】

The ethics of preconception expanded carrier screening in patients seeking assisted reproduction

机译:寻求辅助繁殖的患者的偏见扩增载体筛查的伦理

获取原文
           

摘要

Expanded carrier screening (ECS) entails a screening offer for carrier status for multiple recessive disorders simultaneously and allows testing of couples or individuals regardless of ancestry or geographic origin. Although universal ECS—referring to a screening offer for the general population—has generated considerable ethical debate, little attention has been given to the ethics of preconception ECS for patients applying for assisted reproduction using their own gametes. There are several reasons why it is time for a systematic reflection on this practice. Firstly, various European fertility clinics already offer preconception ECS on a routine basis, and others are considering such a screening offer. Professionals involved in assisted reproduction have indicated a need for ethical guidance for ECS. Secondly, it is expected that patients seeking assisted reproduction will be particularly interested in preconception ECS, as they are already undertaking the physical, emotional and economic burdens of such reproduction. Thirdly, an offer of preconception ECS to patients seeking assisted reproduction raises particular ethical questions that do not arise in the context of universal ECS: the professional’s involvement in the conception implies that both parental and professional responsibilities should be taken into account. This paper reflects on and provides ethical guidance for a responsible implementation of preconception ECS to patients seeking assisted reproduction using their own gametes by assessing the proportionality of such a screening offer: do the possible benefits clearly outweigh the possible harms and disadvantages? If so, for what kinds of disorders and under what conditions?.
机译:扩展的载体筛选(ECS)需要同时为多个隐性疾病的载波状态进行筛选报价,并且允许无论祖先或地理起源如何测试夫妻或个人。虽然普遍的ECS-参考一般人群的筛查报价 - 已经产生了相当大的道德辩论,但对于使用自己的配子施用辅助复制的患者,申请辅助ECS的伦理很少。有几个原因为什么它是对这种做法的系统反思的时候。首先,各种欧洲生育诊所已经以常规提供了先入为主ECS,而其他欧洲生育诊所已经提供了先入为主ECS,而其他人则正在考虑这样的筛选提议。参与辅助复制的专业人士表示需要ECS的道德指导。其次,预计寻求协助繁殖的患者将特别感兴趣,因为它们已经在进行这种繁殖的身体,情感和经济负担。第三,向寻求协助生殖的患者提供一种先入为主ECS的提议提出了在普遍ECS的背景下不会出现的特殊道德问题:专业人员的参与意味着应考虑父母和职业责任。本文反映了并提供了伦理指导,以便通过评估此类筛选要约的比例来利用自己的配子来寻求协助繁殖的患者对患者进行负责实施的道德指导:可能的益处明确超过可能的危害和缺点吗?如果是这样,对于什么样的疾病和在什么条件下?

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号