首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Clinical outcomes of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy at different times and fractionations
【24h】

Clinical outcomes of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy at different times and fractionations

机译:不同时间和分级胸部放射治疗的广泛阶段小细胞肺癌患者的临床结果

获取原文
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to assess whether thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) combined with chemotherapy (CHT) showed promising anti-tumour activity in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), to explore practice patterns for the radiation time and dose/fractionation and to identify prognostic factors for patients who would benefit from CHT/TRT. A total of 492 ES-SCLC patients were included from January 2010 to March 2019, 244 of whom received CHT/TRT. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize bias between the CHT/TRT and CHT-alone groups. Patients in the CHT/TRT group were categorized into four subgroups based on the number of induction CHT cycles. For effective dose fractionation calculations, we introduced the time-adjusted biological effective dose (tBED). Categorical variables were analysed with chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated to estimate survival rates using the R-project. Multivariate prognostic analysis was performed with Cox proportional hazards models. Patients who received CHT/TRT experienced improved overall survival (OS) (18.1 vs 10.8?months), progression-free survival (PFS) (9.3 vs 6.0?months) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (12.0 vs 6.6?months) before matching, with similar results after matching. In the CHT/TRT group, the median LRFS times for the groups based on the radiation time were 12.7, 12.0, 12.0, and 9.0?months, respectively. Early TRT had a tendency to prolong PFS (median 10.6 vs 9.8 vs 9.0 vs 7.7?months, respectively, p?=?0.091) but not OS (median 17.6 vs 19.5 vs 17.2 vs 19.0?months, respectively, p?=?0.622). Notably, patients who received TRT within 6 cycles of CHT experienced prolonged LRFS (p?=?0.001). Regarding the radiation dose, patients in the high-dose group (tBED??50?Gy) who achieved complete response and partial response (CR and PR) to systemic therapy had relatively short OS (median 27.1 vs 22.7, p?=?0.026) and PFS (median 11.4 vs 11.2, p?=?0.032), but the abovementioned results were not obtained after the exclusion of patients who received hyperfractionated radiotherapy (all p??0.05). CHT/TRT could improve survival for ES-SCLC patients. TRT performed within 6 cycles of CHT and hyperfractionated radiotherapy (45?Gy in 30 fractions) may be a feasible treatment scheme for ES-SCLC patients.
机译:本研究的目的是评估胸部放射治疗(TRT)是否与化疗(CHT)结合在广泛的小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)中显示出有前途的抗肿瘤活性,以探索辐射时间和剂量的实践模式/分馏并鉴定将从CHT / TRT受益的患者的预后因素。共有492名ES-SCLC患者于2010年1月到2019年3月,其中244名收到CHT / TRT。进行倾向得分匹配以最小化CHT / TRT和单独组之间的偏压。基于感应CHT周期的数量,CHT / TRT组中的患者分为四个亚组。为了有效剂量分馏计算,我们介绍了时间调整后的生物有效剂量(TBED)。用Chi-Square测试和Fisher的确切测试分析了分类变量。生成了Kaplan-Meier曲线以使用R-Project来估算生存率。用Cox比例危险模型进行多变量预后分析。接受CHT / TRT的患者经历了改善的整体存活(OS)(18.1 vs 10.8?月),无进展生存(PFS)(9.3 vs 6.0?月)和局部复发生存(LRFS)(12.0 VS 6.6?月份)在匹配之前,匹配后具有类似的结果。在CHT / TRT组中,基于辐射时间的基团的中位LRFS时间分别为12.7,12.0,12.0和9.0?数月。早期的TRT倾向于延长PFS(中位数10.6与9.8与9.0 vs 7.7?几个月,P?=?0.091)但不是OS(中位数17.6 Vs 19.5 Vs 17.2 Vs 19.0,分别为19.0个月,P?= 0.622 )。值得注意的是,接收到CHT的6个循环内的TRT的患者经历了延长的LRF(P?= 0.001)。关于辐射剂量,高剂量组(TBED?&?50?GY)达到全身治疗的完全反应和部分反应(CR和PR)的患者具有相对短的操作系统(中位数27.1与22.7,P?= ?0.026)和PFS(中位数11.4 Vs 11.2,p?= 0.032),但排除接受高度放射疗法的患者之后未获得上述结果(所有p?& 0.05)。 CHT / TRT可以改善ES-SCLC患者的存活。在6个CHT和高压放疗中进行的TRT在CHT和Hyperfaction放射疗法(在30分数中45μl)内可能是ES-SCLC患者的可行治疗方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号