...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review
【24h】

Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review

机译:诊断腕管综合征诊断的感觉和电机试验的诊断准确性:系统评价

获取原文

摘要

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment mononeuropathy of the upper extremity. The previous systematic review of the diagnostic tests for CTS was outdated. The objective of this study was to compile and appraise the evidence on the accuracy of sensory and motor tests used for the diagnosis of CTS. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched on January 20, 2020. Studies assessing at least one diagnostic accuracy property of the sensory or motor tests for CTS diagnosis were selected by two independent reviewers. Diagnostic test accuracy extension of the PRISMA guidelines was followed. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were rated using QUADAS-2 tool. Any reported diagnostic accuracy property was summarized. Study characteristics and any information on the accuracy of the sensory and motor tests for CTS diagnosis were extracted. We included sixteen clinical studies, assessing thirteen different sensory or motor tests. The most sensitive test for CTS diagnosis was the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test (with 3.22 in any radial digit as the normal threshold) with sensitivity from 0.49 to 0.96. The tests with the highest specificity (Sp) were palmar grip strength (Sp?=?0.94), pinch grip strength (Sp from 0.78 to 0.95), thenar atrophy (Sp from 0.96 to 1.00), and two-point discrimination (Sp from 0.81 to 0.98). The evidence was inconclusive on which sensory or motor test for CTS diagnosis had the highest diagnostic accuracy. The results suggest that clinicians should not use a single sensory or motor test when deciding on CTS diagnosis. PROSPERO CRD42018109031 , on 20 December 2018.
机译:腕管综合征(CTS)是上肢最常见的血管单一神经病变。先前对CTS诊断测试的系统审查已经过时。本研究的目的是编制和评估有关用于诊断CTS的感官和电机试验的准确性的证据。在2020年1月20日搜索了Medline,Cinahl和Embase数据库。通过两个独立的审查员选择评估CTS诊断的感觉或电机测试的至少一个诊断精度属性。遵循诊断试验准确性延长普遍指南。使用Quadas-2工具评估偏差和适用性问题的风险。总结了任何报告的诊断准确性财产。提取研究特征和关于CTS诊断的感官和电动机试验准确性的任何信息。我们包括十六项临床研究,评估了十三种不同的感官或电机测试。 CTS诊断最敏感的测试是Semmes-Weinstein单丝测试(任何径向数字为3.22,常规阈值),灵敏度为0.49至0.96。具有最高特异性(SP)的测试是Palmar夹具强度(SP?= 0.94),夹紧夹具强度(SP为0.78至0.95),细胞萎缩(SP为0.96至1.00),以及两点辨别(SP 0.81至0.98)。证据是不确定的,其中CTS诊断的感官或电机测试具有最高的诊断准确性。结果表明,临床医生在决定CTS诊断时不应使用单个感官或电机测试。 2018年12月20日,Prospero CRD42018109031。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号