首页> 外文期刊>PLoS One >Differences in study workload stress and its associated factors between transfer students and freshmen entrants in an Asian higher education context
【24h】

Differences in study workload stress and its associated factors between transfer students and freshmen entrants in an Asian higher education context

机译:亚洲高等教育背景中转移学生与新生参赛者之间研究工作量压力及其相关因素的差异

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Unlike the studies of freshmen entrants, the learning experiences of community college transfer (CCT) students in the receiving university is a topic that has only started to gain attention in recent decades. Little is known about the differences between CCT and freshmen entrants with regard to their study workload stress and its relationship with their perceptions of the teaching and learning environment, approaches to learning, self-efficacy and generic skills. The purpose of our study was to address this gap. This was a cross-sectional survey study conducted from April 2018 to November 2018 in a university in Hong Kong. The HowULearn questionnaire was adapted to local usage and validated for data collection. In total, 841 CCT students and 978 freshmen entrants completed the survey. The respondents were aged between 19 and 52 years (mean = 21.6, SD = 1.92), and 66.0% were women. The HowULearn questionnaire was determined by factor analyses to have eight factors. The reliabilities of the eight factors were found to be acceptable (Cronbach alphas = 0.709–0.918). The CCT students scored significantly higher than the freshmen entrants for perceived study workload stress and surface approaches to learning, but lower on teaching for understanding & encouraging learning, peer support, and self-efficacy beliefs. The surface approach to learning, deep & organized studying, alignment & constructive feedback, and generic skills were found to be predictors of study workload stress in both groups of students, and in the overall student data. This study has shown that CCT students and freshmen entrants differed with regard to their study workload stress and learning experiences. Our findings provide a message, both for educators in higher education and policy makers in the government—there is not a one-size-fits-all approach to different student populations when it comes to enhancing their learning experiences.
机译:与新生参赛者的研究不同,接收大学的社区学院转移(CCT)学生的学习经历是近几十年来才能开始引起关注的话题。关于CCT与新生参赛者之间的差异,关于他们的研究工作负载压力及其与教学和学习环境的看法,学习,自我效能和通用技能的方法的关系。我们研究的目的是解决这个差距。这是2018年4月至2018年11月在香港的大学中进行的横断面调查研究。 Hofulearn问卷调查适用于本地使用,并验证数据收集。总共,841名CCT学生和978名新生参赛者完成了调查。受访者年龄在19到52岁之间(平均值= 21.6,SD = 1.92),66.0%是女性。通过因素分析确定了榴弹夏问卷。发现八种因素的可靠性是可接受的(Cronbach alphas = 0.709-0.918)。 CCT学生们均明显高于新生参赛者,用于感知研究工作负载压力和学习方法,但对理解和鼓励学习,同行支持和自我效能信仰的教学降低。学习,深度和有组织的学习,对准和建设性反馈以及通用技能的表面方法是在两组学生和整体学生数据中的研究工作负荷压力的预测因素。本研究表明,CCT学生和新生参赛者在学习工作量压力和学习经验方面不同。我们的调查结果提供了一条消息,适用于政府高等教育和政策制定者的教育工作者 - 在提高学习经验时,没有一定规模适合不同的学生群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号