首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Cross-Cultural Comparison of Mental Health Between German and South African Employees: Shame, Self-Compassion, Work Engagement, and Work Motivation
【24h】

Cross-Cultural Comparison of Mental Health Between German and South African Employees: Shame, Self-Compassion, Work Engagement, and Work Motivation

机译:德国和南非员工心理健康的跨文化比较:羞耻,自我同情,工作参与和工作动机

获取原文
           

摘要

The negative impact of the coronavirus disease outbreak 2019 (COVID-19) on work mental health is reported in many countries including Germany and South Africa: two culturally distinct countries. This study aims to compare mental health between the two workforces to appraise how cultural characteristics may impact their mental health status. A cross-sectional study was used with self-report measures regarding (i) mental health problems, (ii) mental health shame, (iii) self-compassion, (iv) work engagement and (v) work motivation. 257 German employees and 225 South African employees have completed those scales. This study reports results following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. T -tests, correlation and regression analyses were performed. German employees had lower mental health problems and mental health shame, and higher self-compassion than South Africans. Mental health problems were positively associated with mental health shame and amotivation, and negatively associated with work engagement and intrinsic motivation in both groups. Lastly, self-compassion, a PP 2.0 construct, was the strongest predictor for mental health problems in both countries. Our results suggest (i) that German culture’s long-term orientation, uncertainty avoidance and restraint may help explain these differences, and (ii) that self-compassion was important to mental health in both countries. While the levels of mental health differed between the two countries, cultivating self-compassion may be an effective way to protect mental health of employees in those countries. Findings can help inform managers and HR staff to refine their wellbeing strategies to reduce the negative impact of the pandemic, especially in German-South African organizations.
机译:在包括德国和南非在内的许多国家(包括德国和南非)在包括德国和南非的许多国家,冠状病毒疾病爆发2019年(Covid-19)的负面影响是:两个文化截然不同的国家。本研究旨在比较两个员工之间的心理健康,以评估文化特征如何影响其心理健康状况。横截面研究与自我报告措施一起使用(i)心理健康问题,(ii)心理健康羞辱,(iii)自我同情,(iv)工作参与和(v)工作动机。 257名德国员工和225名南非员工已完成这些尺度。本研究报告结果在加强流行病学(频闪)指南中的观察研究报告后的结果。进行T -Tests,相关性和回归分析。德国员工的心理健康问题和心理健康羞辱,比南非人更高的自我同情心。心理健康问题与心理健康羞辱和疟原感染呈正相关,并与两组的工作参与和内在动机负相关。最后,自我同情,PP 2.0结构是两国心理健康问题的最强预测因子。我们的结果建议(i)德国文化的长期取向,不确定性避免和克制可能有助于解释这些差异,(ii)自我同情对两国心理健康都很重要。虽然两国的心理健康水平不同,但培养自我同情可能是保护这些国家员工心理健康的有效途径。调查结果可以帮助管理人员和人力资源人员改善他们的福祉战略,以减少大流行的负面影响,特别是在德国 - 南非组织中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号