...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Oncology Practice >Lay Health Worker-Led Cancer Symptom Screening Intervention and the Effect on Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Health Status, Health Care Use, and Total Costs: Results From a Tri-Part Collaboration
【24h】

Lay Health Worker-Led Cancer Symptom Screening Intervention and the Effect on Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Health Status, Health Care Use, and Total Costs: Results From a Tri-Part Collaboration

机译:奠定卫生工作者主导的癌症筛选干预和对患者报告的满意度,健康状况,医疗用途以及总成本的影响:Tri部分合作的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

PURPOSE:Poor patient experiences and increasing costs from undertreated symptoms require approaches that improve patient-reported outcomes and lower expenditures. We developed and evaluated the effect of a lay health worker (LHW)-led symptom screening intervention on satisfaction, self-reported overall and mental health, health care use, total costs, and survival.METHODS:From November 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016, we enrolled in this study all newly diagnosed Medicare Advantage enrollees with stage 3 or 4 solid tumors or hematologic malignancies who were receiving care in a community oncology practice. We evaluated symptom changes from baseline to 12 months for the intervention group. We compared with a control group (a historical cohort of Medicare Advantage enrollees diagnosed with cancer from November 1, 2014, to October 31, 2015) changes in satisfaction and overall and mental health with validated assessments at diagnosis and 5 months postdiagnosis, 12-month health care use, total costs, and survival.RESULTS:Among 186 patients in the intervention group and 102 in the control group, most were female and non-Hispanic white or Hispanic, and the mean age was 79 years. There were no survival differences between the groups. Relative to the control group, the intervention group experienced improvements in satisfaction with care (difference-in-difference: 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.63), overall health (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.49 to 3.32), and mental or emotional health (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.46 to 3.38) over time; fewer hospitalizations (mean ± standard deviation: 0.72 ± 0.96 v 1.02 ± 1.44; P = .03) and emergency department visits per 1,000 members per year (0.61 ± 0.98 v 0.92 ± 1.53; P = .03), and lower median (interquartile range) total health care costs ($21,266 [$8,102-$47,900] v $31,946 [$15,754-$57,369]; P = .02).CONCLUSION:An LHW-led symptom screening intervention could be one solution to improve value-based cancer care.
机译:目的:患者经验不良,下降症状的成本增加需要改善患者报告的结果和降低支出的方法。我们开发并评估了卫生工作者(LHW)-LED症状筛选干预对满意度,自我报告的整体和心理健康,医疗用途,总成本和求生存的影响。方法:2015年11月1日至9月2016年30日,我们注册了这项研究,所有新诊断的Medicare优势,患有阶段3或4阶段的肿瘤或血液学恶性肿瘤,他们在社区肿瘤学实践中受到护理。我们评估了干预组的基线到12个月的症状变化。我们与对照组(2015年11月1日诊断患有癌症的医疗保险优势登记群)进行比较)满足和整体和心理健康的变化,诊断诊断和5个月后诊断评估,12个月保健使用,总成本和生存。结果:186名患者在干预组和对照组中的102名患者中,大多数是女性和非西班牙裔或西班牙裔,平均年龄为79岁。组之间没有生存差异。相对于对照组,干预组经历了满足的改善(差异:1.35; 95%CI,1.08至1.63),整体健康状况(差价率,2.23; 95%CI,1.49至3.32),和精神或情绪健康(赔率比,2.22; 95%CI,1.46至3.38)随着时间的推移;住院时间较少(平均值±标准差:0.72±0.96 V 1.02±1.44; P = .03)和每年每年的急诊部门访问每年(0.61±0.98 V 0.92±1.53; p = .03)和更低的中位数(四分位数范围)卫生保健费用(21,266美元($ 8,102- $ 47,900] V $ 31,946 [$ 15,754- $ 57,369]; p = .02)。结论:LHW-LED症状筛选干预可能是改善基于价值的癌症护理的一种解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号