首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Mental Health >Efficacy of a Six-Week-Long Therapist-Guided Online Therapy Versus Self-help Internet-Based Therapy for COVID-19–Induced Anxiety and Depression: Open-label, Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Efficacy of a Six-Week-Long Therapist-Guided Online Therapy Versus Self-help Internet-Based Therapy for COVID-19–Induced Anxiety and Depression: Open-label, Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:六周长的治疗师引导的在线治疗的疗效与基于自助互联网的焦虑和抑郁症的自助互联网治疗:开放标签,务实,随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a notable increase in psychological distress, globally. Oman is no exception to this, with several studies indicating high levels of anxiety and depression among the Omani public. There is a need for adaptive and effective interventions that aim to improve the elevated levels of psychological distress due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective This study aimed to comparatively assess the efficacy of therapist-guided online therapy with that of self-help, internet-based therapy focusing on COVID-19–induced symptoms of anxiety and depression among individuals living in Oman during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This was a 6-week-long pragmatic randomized controlled trial involving 60 participants who were recruited from a study sample surveyed for symptoms of anxiety or depression among the Omani public amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants in the intervention group were allocated to receive 1 online session per week for 6 weeks from certified psychotherapists in Oman; these sessions were conducted in Arabic or English. The psychotherapists utilized cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy interventions. Participants in the control group received an automatic weekly newsletter via email containing self-help information and tips to cope with distress associated with COVID-19. The information mainly consisted of behavioral tips revolving around the principles of cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy. The primary outcome was measured by comparing the change in the mean scores of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale from the baseline to the end of the study (ie, after 6 sessions) between the two groups. The secondary outcome was to compare the proportions of participants with depression and anxiety between the two groups. Results Data from 46 participants were analyzed (intervention group n=22, control group n=24). There was no statistical difference in the baseline characteristics between both groups. Analysis of covariance indicated a significant reduction in the GAD-7 scores (F1,43=7.307; P=.01) between the two groups after adjusting for baseline scores. GAD-7 scores of participants in the intervention group were considerably more reduced than those of participants in the control group (β=?3.27; P=.01). Moreover, a greater reduction in mean PHQ-9 scores was observed among participants in the intervention group (F1,43=8.298; P=.006) than those in the control group (β=?4.311; P=.006). Although the levels of anxiety and depression reduced in both study groups, the reduction was higher in the intervention group (P=.049) than in the control group (P=.02). Conclusions This study provides preliminary evidence to support the efficacy of online therapy for improving the symptoms of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 crisis in Oman. Therapist-guided online therapy was found to be superior to self-help, internet-based therapy; however, both therapies could be considered as viable options.
机译:背景技术Covid-19大流行导致全球心理窘迫的显着增加。阿曼对此并不例例,有几项研究表明阿曼公众的高水平焦虑和萧条。需要适应性和有效的干预措施,旨在提高由于Covid-19大流行为期提高的心理困扰水平。目的本研究旨在相对评估治疗师指导的在线治疗的疗效,以自助,互联网的疗法关注在Covid-19大流行期间居住在阿曼的个人焦虑和抑郁症状的焦虑和抑郁症状。方法这是一个6周长的务实随机对照试验,涉及60名参与者,这些参与者是从Covid-19大流行病中被调查的研究样本中招募了焦虑或抑郁症的症状。干预组的参与者分配为每周收到1次在阿曼的心理治疗师6周的在线会议;这些会议以阿拉伯语或英语进行。心理治疗师使用认知行为治疗和接受和承诺治疗干预措施。对照组的参与者通过包含包含自助信息和提示的电子邮件收到自动周刊通讯,以应对与Covid-19相关的遇险。这些信息主要由围绕认知行为治疗和接受和承诺治疗的原则旋转的行为提示。通过比较患者健康调查问卷-9(PHQ-9)和一般焦虑症-7(GAD-7)从基线到研究结束(即6后两组之间的会话)。二次结果是比较参与者对两组之间的抑郁和焦虑的比例。结果分析了来自46名参与者的数据(干预组N = 22,对照组N = 24)。两组之间的基线特征没有统计学差异。调整基线评分后,协方差分析表明两组之间的GAD-7分数(F1,43 = 7.307; p = .01)显着降低。干预组参与者的GAD-7分数比对照组的参与者(β= 3.27; p = .01)更加减少。此外,在干预组的参与者中观察到平均pHQ-9分数的更大减少(F1,43 = 8.298; p = .006)(β= 4.311; p = .006)。虽然两种研究组中焦虑和抑郁水平降低,但干预组的还原比对照组(p = .02)更高。结论本研究提供了初步证据,以支持在线疗法治疗在阿曼的Covid-19危机期间改善焦虑和抑郁症状的疗效。发现治疗师引导的在线疗法优于自助,基于互联网的疗法;然而,两种疗法都可以被视为可行的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号