首页> 外文期刊>Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences >Impact of positive surgical margin on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer
【24h】

Impact of positive surgical margin on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer

机译:阳性外科缘对局部晚期前列腺癌自由基前列腺切除术后生物化学复发的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

This study aimed to determine the effect of surgical margin positivity on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). The medical records of all patients with locally advanced PCa that underwent RRP were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, digital rectal examination findings, prostate biopsy Gleason score, prostate volume, pre- and post-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, definitive pathology Gleason score, surgical margin status, seminal vesicle invasion, perineural invasion, absence or presence of BCR, and the time to BCR were analyzed. The study included 130 patients. The final pathologic examination showed that seven (5.4%) patients had T3a disease and 123 (94.6%) had T3b disease. In all, 93 (71.5%) patients had a positive surgical margin [SM(+)], whereas 37 (28.5%) patients had a negative surgical margin [SM(?)]. Among the seven patients with pT3a disease, four (57.1%) had SM(+), whereas 89 (72.4%) of the 123 patients with pT3b disease had SM(?). BCR occurred in 11.8% (11 of 93) of patients with SM(+) and in 45.9% (17 of 37) of those with SM(?) ( p ??0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that SM(+) was the only significant predictor of BCR following RRP (relative risk, 0.163; 95% confidence interval (0.062–0.433); p ??0.001). SM(+) in RRP specimens is not always indicative of BCR in patients with locally advanced PCa. RRP should be considered an effective treatment choice for selected patients with locally advanced PCa, despite the associated high SM(+) rate.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定生化复发(BCR)手术切缘阳性的患者局部晚期前列腺癌(PCA)谁接受根治性前列腺切除(RRP)的影响。所有患者的局部晚期前列腺癌的医疗记录了经历了RRP进行回顾性分析。病人的人口统计,直肠指检发现,前列腺活检Gleason评分,前列腺体积,预处理和后处理的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平,确定的病理学Gleason评分,手术切缘状态,精囊浸润,神经浸润,不存在或存在BCR的,时间到BCR进行了分析。该研究共纳入130例患者。最终的病理检查结果显示,七(5.4%)患者T3A疾病和123(94.6%)有T3B疾病。总之,93(71.5%)患者具有阳性手术切缘[SM(+)],而37(28.5%)患者具有负手术切缘[SM(?)。其中7例PT3A疾病,四(57.1%)有SM(+),而123例pT3b疾病89例(72.4%)有SM(?)。 BCR的患者发生11.8%(93 11)与SM(+)和在那些与SM的45.9%(37 17)(P&LT?; 0.001)(?)。多变量logistic回归分析显示,SM(+)为BCR的以下RRP唯一显著预测因子(相对风险,0.163mmol; 95%置信区间(0.062-0.433); P<?0.001)。 SM(+)在RRP标本并不总是指示患者局部晚期前列腺癌BCR的。 RRP应考虑选择治疗局部晚期前列腺癌的有效治疗方法的选择,尽管相关的高SM(+)率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号